Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026
Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
Peri-Implant Tissue Stability Following Guided Bone Regeneration With Bioceramic: A Multicenter One-Year Cohort Study
Yulan Wang1,2, Jian Zhang3, Runfa Wu4
1State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Objectives:
This multicenter prospective cohort study follows a 1-year period after a previously published randomized controlled trial, comparing the radiographic and clinical outcomes of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) using bioceramic (BC) versus xenograft (BO).
Materials And Methods:
Patients from the previous trial were recalled 1 year after crown delivery. The follow-up data focused on the buccal bone stability evaluated by CBCT and implant survival rate, Probing Depth (PD), Bleeding on Probing (BOP), Plaque Index (PI), and patient satisfaction through Oral Health Impact Profile-5 (OHIP-5).
Results:
Out of 150 enrolled patients in a previous trial, a total of 97 patients completed the 1-year follow-up: 44 in the BC group and 53 in the BO group. The implant survival rate was 100% in both groups. Change in horizontal buccal bone thickness (△HBBT) at 1 year post-crown delivery versus immediately post-surgery was -0.28 ± 0.10 mm for the BC group and -0.91 ± 0.09 mm (mean ± standard error) for the BO group, with the BC group exhibiting less bone resorption along the implant than the BO group (p = 0.0000). No significant differences were observed in PI, BOP, or PD. Patient satisfaction remained high in both groups.
Conclusions:
GBR with bioceramic demonstrated stable radiographical bone on the buccal side of the implant 1 year after crown delivery.
