Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

09:18
Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
Published on: December 15, 2023
Internal Consistency of the Hadlock Estimated Fetal Weight Reference: Methodological Analysis
Theophilus K Adu-Bredu1,2, Clement Twumasi3, Sam Mathewlynn1,2
1Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Summary
The Hadlock estimated fetal weight (EFW) chart shows significant disparities compared to its regression equation, leading to underestimation of small for gestational age infants. This impacts clinical assessments of fetal growth.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Fetal Medicine
- Biostatistics
Background:
- The Hadlock reference chart is widely used for estimating fetal weight (EFW).
- Internal consistency of the chart and its derived regression equation is crucial for accurate fetal growth assessment.
- Discrepancies can lead to misclassification of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the internal consistency of the Hadlock EFW normal range.
- To assess the clinical implications of any identified disparities between the chart and its regression equation.
- To determine if the Hadlock chart accurately reflects expected population proportions for fetal growth.
Main Methods:
- Methodological analysis and retrospective audit of pregnancies.
- Reanalysis of the original Hadlock EFW chart using functional data analysis (FDA) and penalized functional regression (PFFR-GAM).
- Retrospective analysis of EFW centiles in a cohort of 21,874 pregnancies between 35 and 36 weeks gestation, comparing chart-derived and equation-derived centiles.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant disparity was found between chart-derived and equation-derived EFW centiles.
- The chart-derived 3rd and 10th centiles corresponded to the equation-derived 1st and 6th centiles, respectively.
- The chart underestimated the incidence of SGA fetuses, classifying fewer infants below the 3rd and 10th centiles than the equation.
Conclusions:
- Systematic disparities exist between the published Hadlock chart and its regression equation.
- Equation-derived centiles more closely align with expected population proportions.
- The Hadlock chart significantly underestimates the incidence of small for gestational age fetuses, impacting clinical interpretation.
