Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Line Shape Analysis of Dynamic NMR Spectra for Characterizing Coordination Sphere Rearrangements at a Chiral Rhenium Polyhydride Complex
Published on: July 27, 2022
Hyperfine Coupling Quantifies Hole Delocalization in Triarylamine Radical Cations of D-χ-A Molecules
Charlotte Fuqua1, Ashly Gasior1, Rilee Martzloff1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, United States.
None:
Spin-charge delocalization can reshape the hyperfine landscape that governs magnetic-field response in spin-correlated radical pairs (SCRPs), but delocalization is often hard to quantify experimentally. Here we show the isotropic 14N hyperfine coupling (AN) of triarylamine radical cations provides an experimental metric of hole delocalization in donor-chiral bridge-acceptor molecules, where triarylamine acts as an electron donor. We modulate delocalization through a donor series that varies the N-aryl π-manifold (extension/fusion) and its torsion control. Room-temperature cw-EPR resolves the 14N three-line pattern for radical cations generated chemically and electrochemically at room temperature. AN decreases as spin density moves off the N-centered aryl and into distal rings, correlating with both density functional theory (DFT) Fermi-contact terms and global delocalization metrics. In contrast, the visible-NIR radical-cation absorption contains two overlapping transitions that depend primarily on local N-bound aryl identity and therefore do not uniquely track delocalization. These findings provide a practical route to systematically tuning the effective hyperfine scale relevant to SCRP magnetic response.
More Related Videos
08:22Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization
Published on: August 6, 2018
08:04Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Cations: Structural Overview
Removing one hydrogen from the intervening CH2 group with both...
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy: Organic Radicals