Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Nudging Toward Sustainable and Healthy Diets: A Randomized Trial of Young Adults
Carmen E Prestemon1,2, Anna H Grummon3,4, Sarah M Frank1
1Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Background:
Young adulthood is an optimal time for intervening in dietary behaviors. Young adults in the United States strongly value environmental sustainability, so appealing to these values could be a promising strategy to improve dietary quality.
Objectives:
We examined whether a "stealth" intervention that explicitly appealed to sustainability (climate-impact labels, climate-focused social comparison messages) while also promoting healthier options (through healthy and sustainable swap recommendations) improved the healthfulness of food selections.
Methods:
Participants (United States young adults aged 18-25 y) were randomized in Qualtrics to the experimental (n = 1074) or control (n = 1075) arm and selected 1 protein, frozen meal, and snack they would most like to purchase. All foods varied by healthfulness (Nutri-Score algorithm, range A-E). Participants in the experimental arm received nudges appealing to sustainability, including viewing front-of-package labels showing whether the food had low, medium, or high climate-impact and, if they selected a high climate-impact food, viewing a climate-focused social comparison message and swap recommendation to low or medium climate-impact foods with a healthy Nutri-Score (A or B). Control arm participants did not receive any nudges.
Results:
Experimental arm participants selected foods that were 3.9 points healthier than participants in the control arm (P < 0.001, d = 0.67). Effects of the nudges on healthfulness did not differ by gender, education, financial situation, red meat consumption, political beliefs, or interest in sustainability (all P-interaction ≥0.13). Experimental arm participants selected foods with a carbon footprint 0.76 kg CO2-eq/100 g lower than control arm participants (P < 0.001, d = 0.93). Compared with the control, experimental arm participants thought more about sustainability (P < 0.001), less about taste (P < 0.001) and cost (P = 0.02), and similar amounts about healthfulness (P = 0.32) when selecting foods.
Conclusions:
"Stealth" nudges appealing to sustainability while also incorporating health considerations could encourage a wide range of young adults to select more healthful and sustainable foods.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06119165 and at aspredicted.org as 147,997.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Regulation of Food Intake
Dietary Connections
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...
Obesity
Self-Schemas
