Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
When hosts gather: how extreme seasonal aggregation affects epidemiological outcomes
Daniel N R Longmuir1,2, Simon Johnstone-Robertson1, Andrew J Hoskins3,4
1Mathematical Sciences, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Extreme wildlife aggregation can trigger epidemics, especially for pathogens with low transmissibility (R0≈1 or R0<1). This effect is most pronounced under density-dependent transmission when aggregation aligns with infection introduction.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Epidemiology
- Mathematical Biology
Background:
- Wildlife aggregations, driven by factors like reproduction and feeding, can drastically increase host densities.
- While seasonality's impact on infectious diseases is known, the effect of extreme aggregation on epidemiological outcomes remains understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how extreme wildlife aggregation influences key epidemiological parameters, specifically final epidemic size and peak prevalence.
- To explore the role of aggregation timing and duration in shaping disease dynamics within a metapopulation model.
Main Methods:
- A closed Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) metapopulation model with a hub-satellite structure was employed.
- Seasonal movement into the hub was modeled using a modified Gaussian function.
- Numerical simulations were used to explore the impact of aggregation on epidemic outcomes.
Main Results:
- Extreme aggregation significantly alters epidemic outcomes only under specific conditions, particularly when aggregation coincides with or precedes infection introduction.
- Pathogens with a basic reproduction number (R0) close to 1 or less than 1 are most affected, with aggregation enabling epidemics that might otherwise decline.
- The impact of aggregation is strongest under density-dependent transmission; frequency-dependent transmission renders aggregation effects negligible.
- High transmissibility (R0 >> 2) minimizes aggregation's impact as most susceptible individuals are infected regardless of density changes.
Conclusions:
- Extreme wildlife aggregation is a critical factor in disease dynamics, but its influence is context-dependent, particularly concerning pathogen transmissibility and transmission mode.
- Understanding aggregation patterns and timing is crucial for predicting and managing wildlife epidemics, especially for pathogens with moderate to low transmissibility.
Related Concept Videos
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Causality in Epidemiology
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Introduction to Epidemiology
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Steps in Outbreak Investigation

