Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics for Predicting Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in Individuals Undergoing Gestational Diabetes Screening
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Monitoring Blood Glucose in Mouse Offspring After Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
Published on: May 17, 2024
Caleb Griffiths1, Rafael Bravo Santos2, Sarah A Wernimont3
1Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Insights
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics indicating sustained high blood sugar, not just variability, better predict adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes screening. These findings can refine pregnancy glucose monitoring strategies.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Endocrinology
- Neonatal Medicine
Background:
- Gestational diabetes screening is crucial for maternal and neonatal health.
- Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers detailed glycemic insights.
- Previous research linked elevated time above range (≥10% time >140 mg/dL) to adverse neonatal outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if various CGM metrics, including those for glycemic variability (GV) and extremes, predict adverse neonatal outcomes.
- To compare the predictive power of new CGM metrics against existing thresholds.
Main Methods:
- Eighty-four pregnant individuals used CGM for 10 days post-glucose challenge test.
- Generalized estimating equation logistic regression analyzed associations between CGM metrics and a composite neonatal outcome (large-for-gestational-age, intravenous glucose, or shoulder dystocia).
- Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Main Results:
- Multiple CGM metrics, including mean glucose, SD, %Time >140 mg/dL, GMI, MAGE, and HBGI, were significantly associated with adverse neonatal outcomes (P < .05).
- Several metrics showed superior predictive discrimination compared to the ≥10% time-above-range threshold (AUROC=0.643).
- Notably, %Time >140 mg/dL (AUROC=0.703) and HBGI (AUROC=0.701) demonstrated the highest predictive power.
Conclusions:
- CGM metrics reflecting sustained hyperglycemia or high glucose levels are stronger predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes than GV-focused metrics.
- Persistent or extreme maternal hyperglycemia, rather than glycemic variability alone, appears to be the primary driver of neonatal risk.
- These findings support refining CGM-based screening and management strategies for gestational diabetes.
Objectives:
This study evaluates whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics predict adverse neonatal outcomes among individuals undergoing gestational diabetes screening. Building on findings by Fishel Bartal et al, who reported an association between ≥10% time above 140 mg/dL and a composite neonatal outcome, this analysis examines 13 additional CGM-derived measures reflecting glycemic variability (GV) and glycemic extremes.
Methods:
Eighty-four pregnant individuals wore CGM devices for 10 days following a 1-hour 50 g glucose challenge test. Generalized estimating equation logistic regression models assessed associations between CGM metrics and a composite neonatal outcome consisting of large-for-gestational-age birth, need for intravenous glucose treatment, or shoulder dystocia. Model discrimination was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results:
Several CGM measures-including mean glucose, standard deviation (SD), maximum glucose, %Time >140 mg/dL, %Time >120 mg/dL, glucose management indicator (GMI), mean of daily differences (MODD), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), area under the CGM curve (AUC-CGM), and high blood glucose index (HBGI)-were significantly associated with adverse neonatal outcomes (P < .05). Metrics demonstrating higher discrimination than the original ≥10% time-above-range measure (AUROC = 0.643) included SD (0.656), MAGE (0.665), mean glucose (0.676), GMI (0.676), maximum glucose (0.683), %Time >120 mg/dL (0.683), AUC-CGM (0.692), HBGI (0.701), and %Time >140 mg/dL (0.703).
Conclusions:
Continuous glucose monitoring metrics reflecting sustained or high-level hyperglycemia, rather than GV-focused metrics, more strongly predicted adverse neonatal outcomes. These findings suggest that persistent or extreme maternal glucose elevations, rather than variability alone, may drive neonatal risk and support refining CGM-based screening approaches in pregnancy.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility, suggesting a...
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Hyperglycemia
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
