Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS and PSA density for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
Walid Shanaa1, Ibrahim Alnadhari2, Omar Ali2
1Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Al Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation.
Background:
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), interpreted using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), is increasingly used to improve prostate cancer detection and reduce unnecessary biopsies. However, its diagnostic accuracy compared with histopathological confirmation remains variable across institutions. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between mpMRI findings and TRUS-guided prostate biopsy results in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in our patient cohort.
Methods:
This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study included 100 biopsy records (86 unique patients) who underwent mpMRI followed by TRUS-guided biopsy. mpMRI findings were scored using PI-RADS v2, while biopsy histopathology served as the reference standard. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2. Diagnostic performance was assessed for two interpretive rules: (1) Baseline rule: PI-RADS ≥ 4 as positive; (2) Combined rule: PIRADS ≥ 4 or PI-RADS = 3 with PSA density (PSAD) > 0.15 ng/mL/mL. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the RoC curve (AUC) were calculated. Hierarchical logistic regression assessed the independent contribution of PSAD and clinical covariates.
Results:
Malignant cases showed higher PSA (median 10.0 ng/mL vs 7.0 ng/mL) and PSAD (0.32 vs 0.13 ng/mL/mL) and smaller prostate volumes (36.5 mL vs 61.0 mL) compared with benign cases. csPCa detection increased with rising PI-RADS category (3.7% for PI-RADS 3, 56.9 % for PI-RADS 4-5). At the patient level, the Baseline rule achieved sensitivity = 86.7% and specificity = 66.1%, while the Combined rule increased sensitivity to 90.0 % with specificity = 55.4%. The ordinal PI-RADS score demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.826, 95% CI 0.713-0.924). In logistic regression, adding PSAD improved model AUC from 0.836 to 0.888 (p < 0.001), and inclusion of age and prostate volume further increased AUC to 0.900 (p = 0.044). within PI-RADS 3 lesions, the optimal PSAD threshold (youden index) was 0.163 ng/mL/mL, yielding 100% sensitivity and 76% specificity. Postbiopsy complications were within expected ranges, with mild hematuria (29%), minor rectal bleeding (23%), and UTI (7%) being most common.
Conclusions:
mpMRI findings strongly correlated with histopathological outcomes from TRUS-guided biopsy. Incorporating PSA density significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy for csPCa, particularly in equivocal PI-RADS 3 cases. Combining mpMRI and PSAD can refine patient selection for biopsy and improve early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Insights
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) combined with PSA density improves prostate cancer detection accuracy. This approach refines patient selection for biopsy, enhancing early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
Area of Science:
- Urologic Oncology
- Radiology
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) aids prostate cancer detection, aiming to reduce unnecessary biopsies.
- Variability in diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI necessitates further evaluation against histopathological confirmation.
- This study assesses the correlation between mpMRI findings and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, interpreted using PI-RADS v2, in detecting csPCa.
- To assess the correlation between mpMRI findings and TRUS-guided biopsy results.
- To determine the added value of PSA density (PSAD) and clinical covariates in improving diagnostic performance.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 100 biopsy records (86 patients) with prior mpMRI and TRUS-guided biopsy.
- PI-RADS v2 scoring for mpMRI; histopathology as the reference standard for csPCa (ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2).
- Evaluation of two rules: Baseline (PI-RADS ≥ 4) and Combined (PI-RADS ≥ 4 or PI-RADS = 3 with PSAD > 0.15).
Main Results:
- Malignant cases had higher PSA and PSAD, and smaller prostate volumes compared to benign cases.
- csPCa detection increased with PI-RADS category; the Combined rule showed higher sensitivity (90.0%) than the Baseline rule (86.7%).
- Ordinal PI-RADS score yielded an AUC of 0.826; adding PSAD, age, and prostate volume improved model AUC to 0.900.
Conclusions:
- mpMRI findings strongly correlate with biopsy-proven histopathological outcomes.
- Incorporating PSA density significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy for csPCa, especially in PI-RADS 3 cases.
- Combining mpMRI with PSAD refines biopsy selection and improves early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
