Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users

Prior research has shown that, among normal hearing college students, Hispanic-identifying participants experience higher levels of environmental noise and lower signal to noise ratios as compared with White non-Hispanic participants. The primary objective of this study was to examine whether these differences extend to cochlear implant (CI) users by using CI datalogging to quantify characteristics of the listeners' auditory environments. The authors further examined whether differences in auditory environments between groups persisted after controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors. The primary socioeconomic variable of interest was population density, as it strongly correlates with other socioeconomic factors (e.g., education and income) and is more likely to directly influence auditory environments.

A retrospective chart review of CI patients at a tertiary medical center in New York City identified 80 adults (38 Hispanic, 42 White non-Hispanic) for further review. Demographic variables were compiled, and home addresses were used to obtain population-based socioeconomic data via the U.S. Census. Datalogging information extracted from the CI speech processor included hours of total use and time spent in different auditory environments, classified by the CI software into sound levels (in dBA) and sound scenes ("noise," "quiet," "speech in noise," "speech in quiet," "music," and "other").

Despite similar levels of device usage, there was a statistically significant group difference in the percentage of time spent in each scene: Hispanic-identifying participants spent more time in "speech in noise," "music," and "noise"; White non-Hispanics spent more time in "quiet" and "other." The Hispanic participants lived in census tracts with higher population density, which correlated with higher sound levels (>70 dBA) in the environment. Group differences in auditory environments remained statistically significant after controlling for age, CI experience, and population density (median daily level difference ~2.4 dB).

Even after accounting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, the two groups showed distinct auditory environments, indicating a possible cultural contribution to these differences. Audiologists counseling CI patients regarding auditory environments should be conscious of their patients' cultural background and may consider the impact of listening preferences when advising on which environments to seek out or avoid.