Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...

Dimensions of Health and Illness

Dimensions of Health and Illness

The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...

Concepts of Health and Illness

Concepts of Health and Illness

Health is a condition of the body, mind, and spirit where an individual remains free from illness. Similarly, wellness is an active state, including living a lifestyle that promotes physical, mental, and emotional health. Physical health is critical for the overall well-being and can be affected by lifestyle, activity level, diet, and behavior. The highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental and universal human right. Consider Lisa, a fifteen-year-old born with congenital...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Reviewer Activity: Self-esteem Rather Than Incentive.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026

Same journal

The Ethical and Psychosocial Dimensions of Palliative Care in Prison : A Scoping Review.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026

Same journal

Reconciling Subsistence Emissions and Prevention in Environmentally Sustainable Healthcare.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026

Same journal

Mapping the Representation of Race and Other Health Disparities in U.S. Orthopaedic Journals : A Scoping Review.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026

Same journal

Safeguarding Physical and Mental Health Rights in African Conflict Regions: Ethical Responsibilities, Barriers, and Collaborative Efforts.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026

Same journal

Ibsen's An Enemy of the People and the Ethics of Public Health Disclosure.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Why the Social Gradient in Health-Related Behaviour is Unjust : An Unconditionalist Perspective.

Paul-Loup Weil-Dubuc^1,2,3

¹Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations U1018 (Inserm/Paris-Saclay), Villejuif, France. Paul-loup.weil-dubuc@universite-paris-saclay.fr.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

|July 1, 2026

Summary

The social gradient in health-related behaviour (SGHB) is unjust due to structural injustice, according to the unconditionalist view. This perspective challenges conditionalist approaches that permit justified health disparities once basic conditions for autonomous choices are met.

Keywords:

Autonomous agency Health-related behaviours Oppression Social gradient in health Structural injustice

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Social Epidemiology
Health Justice
Behavioral Science

Background:

Lower socio-economic position is linked to increased health-damaging behaviors, termed the social gradient in health-related behaviour (SGHB).
The SGHB raises critical questions about fairness and justice in health outcomes.
Existing health justice frameworks often grapple with the ethical implications of this gradient.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine and advocate for the unconditionalist view of the SGHB.
To contrast the unconditionalist perspective with conditionalist approaches in health justice.
To analyze the critiques leveled against unconditionalism by conditionalist frameworks.

Main Methods:

Philosophical analysis of ethical frameworks concerning health justice.
Comparative examination of unconditionalist and conditionalist viewpoints on SGHB.
Critique of arguments based on evaluative individualism within health justice.

Main Results:

The unconditionalist view posits that SGHB is always unjust due to structural injustice.
Conditionalist views, often based on evaluative individualism, argue SGHB is only unjust when autonomy-supporting conditions are unequally distributed.
Critiques of unconditionalism regarding perfectionism and agency are deemed unpersuasive, but empirical challenges remain.

Conclusions:

The unconditionalist stance offers a robust ethical framework for understanding the injustice of the SGHB.
Conditionalist approaches, despite their influence, rely on a potentially problematic empirical basis.
Further research is needed to address the empirical challenges associated with the unconditionalist view of SGHB.