Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enantioselective Radical Ring-Opening Cyanation of Oxime Esters by Dual Photoredox and Copper Catalysis.

Organic letters·2019
Same author

ACCELERATING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING VIA DEEP LEARNING.

Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging·2019
Same author

Technical note: Development and application of KASP assays for rapid screening of 8 genetic defects in Holstein cattle.

Journal of dairy science·2019
Same author

Sesquiterpenes and diterpenes from Euphorbia thymifolia.

Fitoterapia·2019
Same author

Glechomanamides A-C, Germacrane Sesquiterpenoids with an Unusual Δ<sup>8</sup>-7,12-Lactam Moiety from <i>Salvia scapiformis</i> and Their Antiangiogenic Activity.

Journal of natural products·2019
Same author

Parameter optimization framework on wave gradients of Wave-CAIPI imaging.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2019
Same journal

Granular Ball-Based Noise-Resistant Fuzzy Multineighborhood Feature Selection via Label Enhancement and Feature Graph.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Fighting Evolving Spam With ARTMAP Models: A Noise-Resilient Online Detection Framework.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

HyperSAT: Unsupervised Hypergraph Neural Networks for Weighted MaxSAT Problems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Negation of Basic Belief Assignment in Multisource Information Fusion on Dempster-Shafer Theory With Applications in Pattern Classification.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Intervention Feasible Region and Driver Risk Capacity Aware Human-Machine Collaborative Safe Trajectory Planning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

A Unified Differential Denoising Learning Framework With a Pre-Trained Model and Fuzzy Graph Networks for Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

cPU: Consistent Risk Estimator for Positive-Unlabeled Learning.

Yao Zhang, Ke Wang, Jun Tang

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |July 1, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a new method for positive-unlabeled (PU) learning by leveraging class priors to improve risk minimization. The approach enhances classification by enforcing consistency between sample risks and reducing model bias.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Computer Science

    Background:

    • Cost-sensitive methods are classical strategies for positive-unlabeled (PU) learning, aiming to minimize overall risk.
    • Exploiting class priors is common in PU learning but effectively mining supervision information remains challenging.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To derive a novel supervision formulation for PU learning based on risk minimization and class priors.
    • To develop a consistent risk estimator that exploits the fixed distribution of samples in unlabeled data.

    Main Methods:

    • Derived a novel supervision formulation from a risk perspective, utilizing the convergence of risk distribution ratios in unlabeled samples.
    • Constructed a consistent risk estimator to enforce consistency between negative and positive expected risks of respective samples.
    • Introduced Mixup regularization to mitigate confirmation bias and entropy minimization to enhance sample separability.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed method demonstrates advantages over several baseline methods on four benchmark datasets.
    • The novel formulation and risk estimator effectively mine underlying supervision information using class priors.
    • Mixup regularization and entropy minimization further improved classification performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed PU learning approach effectively utilizes class priors for improved risk minimization and classification.
    • The novel risk perspective and techniques like Mixup regularization offer a promising direction for PU learning.
    • The method provides a consistent risk estimator and enhances model robustness and sample separability.