Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

An Assay to Detect Protection of the Retinal Vasculature from Diabetes-Related Death in Mice
Published on: January 12, 2024
Naturalistic driving data can identify elevated driving risk in adults with Type 1 diabetes
Aparna Joshi1, Matthew Rizzo2, Anuj Sharma1
1Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa.
Objective:
Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) may experience acute glucose events, such as hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia, that can impair attention, reaction time, and decision-making during activities of daily living (ADL), such as driving. While continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) detects such events, less is known about whether everyday driving behavior reflects days when these disturbances occur during active vehicle operation. We evaluate whether daily driving behavior differs on days when acute glucose-related impairment occurs during driving among individuals with T1DM.
Methods:
This study followed 18 adults with T1DM (mean age = 30.78; 11 females) over 4 wk. Real-world driving data were continuously recorded, and sleep was assessed using wrist-worn actigraphy as a background daily contextual factor. Glucose levels were measured using CGM. The primary outcome was a high-risk driving day, defined as a day on which hypoglycemia or severe hyperglycemia occurred during active driving, as determined from CGM data. Gradient-boosted decision tree models (XGBoost) were evaluated using a nested leave-one-subject-out cross-validation framework to distinguish high-risk driving days based on behavioral features. Models were trained using driving-only, sleep-only, and combined driving-and-sleep feature sets.
Results:
Models trained using driving features alone demonstrated the most consistent discriminative performance in identifying high-risk driving days (AUROC = 0.67; F1 = 0.65), outperforming the sleep-only and sleep + driving combined model. Influential driving features reflect exposure and temporal patterns, including afternoon peak trips, trips near home, and total driving time. Sleep features alone showed limited ability to distinguish high-risk driving days (AUROC = 0.48).
Conclusions:
Driving exposure features, particularly those capturing trip frequency, timing, and duration, were informative for distinguishing days when glucose-related impairment occurred during driving in individuals with T1DM. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of behavior-based approaches for flagging elevated driving risk when glucose-related impairment occurs. Such approaches may complement physiological monitoring in transportation safety and injury-prevention contexts.
More Related Videos
07:41Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats
Published on: October 23, 2020
11:12Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Type I Diabetes I: Introduction
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Type I Diabetes III: Clinical Manifestations