Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

An Experimental Human DIEP Flap Model to Investigate Preservation Strategies for Vascularized Composite Allografts and Free Flaps
Published on: December 5, 2025
Medial Distal Arm Perforator Flap for elbow Soft Tissue Defects: A Cadaveric Study
Pierre-Antoine Guillaume1, Coralie Bordas2, Martin Cholley-Roulleau3
1Institut de Chirurgie Orthopédique Flandres Audomarois, Clinique ELSAN de Saint Omer, 71 Rue Ambroise Paré 62575 Blendecques, France; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 9 Av. de la Forêt de Haye, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre François Xavier Michelet, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Abstract:
A cadaveric anatomical study was performed on seven fresh adult upper limbs to assess the technical feasibility and reproducibility of a medial distal arm perforator flap for coverage of elbow soft-tissue defects. A theoretical 5-cm-diameter circle, corresponding to the flap skin-paddle width, was centered 7.5 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle on an axis joining the epicondyle to the mid-axillary fossa; this central point defined the flap pivot, and flap length was adjusted to match simulated elbow defects. Between two and five skin perforators were identified within the circle per limb. Perforator origin was from the brachial artery in 54% of specimens and from the superior ulnar collateral artery in 46%. Median distance from perforators to the medial epicondyle was 8.0 cm (range 7.0-9.0 cm). Median perforator diameter was 0.65 mm (range 0.5-0.9 mm). All simulated defects at the medial epicondyle, distal biceps tendon, and olecranon were coverable; median flap lengths required were 12.5 cm (12.5-13.5 cm), 15.0 cm (15-15 cm), and 16.0 cm (15.5-16.5 cm), respectively. Coverage of the lateral epicondyle was achieved in 6 of 7 limbs with a 17-cm flap. These findings indicate that the medial distal arm perforator flap is a reliable, reproducible option for elbow skin defects, providing an effective alternative to conventional flaps without sacrifice of major arteries. A standardized flap design is proposed, specifying a reproducible pivot point, a defined flap width, and clear distal and proximal boundaries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
