Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Diabetes and Risk of Radial Artery Occlusion After Distal Radial Access: Insights From the KODRA Registry
Byung Gyu Kim1, Hyun Cho2, Sung Eun Kim2
1CPC Clinical Research, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, School of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Distal radial access (DRA) is safe for patients with diabetes, showing similar rates of radial artery occlusion (RAO) and bleeding compared to non-diabetic patients. These findings support DRA as a viable option for this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Access
- Diabetes Mellitus
Background:
- Distal radial access (DRA) is increasingly utilized for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Limited evidence exists regarding DRA safety and efficacy in patients with diabetes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between diabetes and forearm radial artery occlusion (RAO) after DRA.
- To compare procedural success and safety outcomes of DRA in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 4,941 patients from the multicenter KODRA registry undergoing attempted DRA.
- Comparison of RAO rates at 1 month, DRA-related bleeding, puncture success, and CAG success between diabetic (n=1,813) and non-diabetic (n=3,128) groups.
Main Results:
- Diabetic patients had comparable rates of RAO (0.5% vs 0.8%; p=0.139) and DRA-related bleeding (3.0% vs 3.4%; p=0.535) to non-diabetic patients.
- Puncture success (94.1% vs 94.5%) and successful CAG without crossover (98.9% vs 98.8%) were similar between groups.
- Multivariable analysis indicated diabetes was not an independent predictor of RAO or other secondary end points.
Conclusions:
- DRA demonstrates comparable safety and efficacy in patients with and without diabetes.
- DRA is a safe and feasible vascular access strategy for diabetic patients undergoing CAG and PCI.
- Standardized techniques are crucial for preserving radial artery patency.
Background:
Distal radial access (DRA) is increasingly used for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention, but evidence in patients with diabetes is limited. We investigated whether diabetes is associated with forearm radial artery occlusion (RAO) after DRA.
Method:
From the multicentre KODRA registry (Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach), 4,941 patients undergoing attempted DRA between September 2019 and September 2021 were analysed: diabetes (n=1,813) and non-diabetes (n=3,128). The primary efficacy end point was forearm RAO at 1 month. Secondary safety end points were DRA-related bleeding, other secondary end points included puncture success, access-site crossover, and successful CAG without crossover.
Results:
Despite a greater burden of comorbidities, patients with diabetes had similar rates of RAO compared with those without diabetes (0.5% vs 0.8%; p=0.139). DRA-related bleeding occurred in 3.0% vs 3.4% (p=0.535), with no major bleeding reported. Puncture success (94.1% vs 94.5%), overall access-site crossover (6.9% vs 6.6%), and successful CAG without crossover (98.9% vs 98.8%) were likewise comparable. In multivariable analysis, diabetes was not independently associated with RAO (odds ratio 0.585; 95% confidence interval 0.261-1.311; p=0.193) or other secondary end points.
Conclusions:
In this large registry, DRA showed comparable RAO, bleeding, and procedural success between patients with and without diabetes. These results support DRA as a safe, feasible access strategy in this higher-risk population and highlight the need for standardised technique to preserve radial artery patency.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Complications of Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetic Retinopathy
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
