Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

Crossover Experiments

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

Test for Homogeneity

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Investigation of factors affecting exercise perception in women with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Rheumatology international·2026

Same author

Evaluation of the shoulder complex in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study.

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies·2026

Same author

Effect of karaoke training applied with telerehabilitation-based exercise training on health-related outcomes in children with asthma.

European journal of pediatrics·2025

Same author

Investigation of metric properties of the Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Physiotherapy theory and practice·2025

Same author

Association Between Spinal Curvature and Mobility and Balance Abilities in Young Soccer Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2025

Same author

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Breathlessness Catastrophizing Scale in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Thoracic research and practice·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults

Published on: November 7, 2014

Not All Corridors are Equal: Corridor Length Affects 6-minute Walk Test Performance-A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Melissa Köprülüoğlu¹, Elvan Felekoğlu¹, Büşra Türk¹

¹Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Health Sciences, İzmir, Türkiye.

Thoracic Research and Practice

|July 2, 2026

Summary

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) using a 10-meter corridor underestimates walking distance and increases fatigue. A 20-meter corridor is a feasible alternative to the standard 30-meter length when space is limited.

Keywords:

6-minute walk test corridor length exercise testing walking distance

More Related Videos

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

Traditional Trail Making Test Modified into Brand-new Assessment Tools: Digital and Walking Trail Making Test

Published on: November 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults

Published on: November 7, 2014

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

Published on: August 23, 2017

Traditional Trail Making Test Modified into Brand-new Assessment Tools: Digital and Walking Trail Making Test

Published on: November 23, 2019

Area of Science:

Exercise Physiology
Clinical Assessment
Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation

Background:

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a standard clinical assessment of functional capacity.
A 30-meter corridor is recommended, but often not feasible in clinical settings.
Shorter corridors may impact test validity and participant experience.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare walking distance and hemodynamic responses during 6MWTs in 10-, 20-, and 30-meter corridors.
To evaluate the feasibility of shorter corridors for the 6MWT in healthy young adults.

Main Methods:

Thirty-four healthy young adults completed randomized 6MWTs in 10-, 20-, and 30-meter corridors using a crossover design.
Measured outcomes included walking distance, speed, step counts, and cardiorespiratory variables.
Subjective measures of dyspnea and fatigue were recorded at multiple time points.

Main Results:

Walking distance and speed were significantly lower in the 10-meter corridor compared to 20- and 30-meter corridors.
Hemodynamic responses were similar across corridor lengths.
The 10-meter corridor resulted in increased post-test fatigue and dyspnea at 5 minutes of recovery.

Conclusions:

A 10-meter corridor underestimates walking distance by approximately 60 meters and increases subjective fatigue and dyspnea.
A 20-meter corridor is a feasible alternative to the standard 30-meter corridor when space is limited.
The 10-meter corridor should be avoided for clinical 6MWT assessments.