Do modest changes in skin temperature affect the measurement of micro- and macrovascular function?

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, driven by risk factors such as atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), assessed as the percentage change in conduit artery vasodilation following local hypoperfusion, is a key tool to evaluate endothelial function. Microvascular changes, such as those induced by thermal stress, may influence baseline vascular conditions and potentially affect macrovascular responses during reactive hyperaemia. This study assesses the impact of skin blood flow on reactive hyperaemia and FMD. An initial FMD measurement was performed at each participant's natural skin temperature (iFMD). After a 20-minute rest, skin temperature was randomly clamped to either 27 °C (cFMD) or 35 °C (wFMD). Baseline measurements revealed significantly higher skin temperature (p < 0.0001) and skin blood flow (p = 0.027) in wFMD compared to iFMD, and significantly lower skin temperature in cFMD (p < 0.0001). Retrograde shear rate was reduced in wFMD (p = 0.04). Cold skin temperature significantly reduced peak blood flow (p = 0.028), antegrade flow (p = 0.028), and conductance (p = 0.031). Peak values measured during reactive hyperaemia were similar between iFMD and wFMD, although skin blood flow was significantly higher in wFMD (p = 0.004). Despite these physiological changes, all calculated FMD values remained consistent across the three skin temperature conditions. Therefore, while FMD calculations appear robust to modest variations in skin temperature, differences in absolute values - particularly those related to skin blood flow - can influence the interpretation of FMD measurements and should be considered when comparing results across varying thermal conditions.