Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Selective non-diverting strategy after restorative rectal cancer surgery: a single-center experience combining
Ilgar Ismayilov1, Vusal Aliyev2,3, Jamil Aliyev4
1Department of General Surgery, Republican Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Abstract:
The role of routine diverting ileostomy after restorative rectal cancer surgery remains controversial. We evaluated a selective non-diverting strategy implemented together with technical modifications of the anastomosis and an intensified postoperative surveillance protocol. This retrospective single-center study included 300 patients who underwent restorative surgery for rectal cancer between 2017 and 2026. Patients were categorized according to reconstruction technique: end-to-end stapled colorectal anastomosis, side-to-end stapled colorectal anastomosis, or delayed coloanal anastomosis using the Turnbull-Cutait technique. The primary endpoint was clinically relevant anastomotic leakage, defined according to the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer classification as Grade B or C leakage. Fisher exact, chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used as appropriate; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for leakage rates. The cohort included 71 end-to-end, 171 side-to-end, and 58 delayed coloanal reconstructions. Clinically relevant leakage occurred in 8/71 patients after end-to-end anastomosis (11.3%, 95% CI 5.0-21.0), 4/171 after side-to-end anastomosis (2.3%, 95% CI 0.6-5.9), and 2/58 after delayed coloanal anastomosis (3.4%, 95% CI 0.4-11.9; p = 0.010). Among non-diverted stapled colorectal anastomoses, clinically relevant leakage was lower after side-to-end reconstruction than after end-to-end reconstruction (1/163 [0.6%] vs. 3/45 [6.7%], p = 0.032). In selected patients, a non-routine diversion strategy combined with optimized anastomotic configuration, routine splenic flexure mobilization when required, delayed coloanal reconstruction for ultra-low tumors, and intensive postoperative surveillance appears feasible. Because several technical and organizational changes were introduced simultaneously, these findings should not be interpreted as proving the independent safety of omitting diversion.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
