Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

08:42
A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Including Research Subjects without Decision-Making Capacity Only as Last Resort
Linus Broström1, Anna Nilsson2
1Docent (associate professor) at the section of medical ethics in the Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, at Lund University.
Ethics & Human Research
|July 2, 2026
Summary
This study examines the ethical principle preventing adults lacking decision-making capacity from research participation. It argues for qualifying this rule to balance protection with inclusion for persons with disabilities.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Disability Rights
- Research Ethics
Background:
- Ethical principle: Adults without decision-making capacity should not be included in research if capable participants are available.
- Disability rights perspective: This principle may be overly protective, limiting inclusion for persons with disabilities.
- Need for balance: Current ethical guidelines may not adequately support equitable research participation for all individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- Analyze the ethical and legal basis of the principle restricting research participation for adults lacking decision-making capacity.
- Evaluate the principle from a disability rights viewpoint, focusing on equitable inclusion.
- Propose modifications to the principle to better balance protection and participation.
Main Methods:
- Ethical analysis of existing research principles.
- Legal review of consent and capacity regulations.
- Disability rights framework application.
Main Results:
- The principle, while intended to protect vulnerable populations, can inadvertently exclude persons with disabilities from research opportunities.
- Current application of the principle may not fully align with the goal of equitable participation in scientific research.
- A qualified approach is needed to ensure both protection and inclusion.
Conclusions:
- The ethical principle regarding research participation for adults without decision-making capacity requires qualification.
- Modifications should enhance opportunities for persons with disabilities to participate in research on an equal footing.
- A balanced approach is essential to uphold ethical standards while promoting inclusive research practices.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Psychosurgery
Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Blinding
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”

