Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development
Published on: February 18, 2021
Structural Equation Modeling Reveals How Allometry Shapes Integration in Avian Cranial Evolution
J W Oyston1, J T Thorson2, A Knapp1
1Division of Cell and Developmental Biology, Centre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Abstract:
Testing hypotheses of phenotypic modularity involves assessing whether groups of traits covary more strongly with each other than with parts outside the group. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a flexible statistical framework for interrogating complex relationships between sets of variables, making it ideally suited to studies of hierarchical modularity and integration. However, quantifying the modular organization of high-dimensional traits using SEM in a phylogenic context has only recently become possible through new methodological advances. Here, we applied SEM to investigate patterns and correlates of phenotypic modularity in the skull and brain of birds. Birds independently evolved relatively large brains multiple times, as well as a wide range of different skull and brain morphologies. While some have proposed the bird skull is composed of several functional or developmental modules, others have suggested the skull is highly integrated, with allometric scaling structuring trait correlations. The data best supported a model in which brain shape is influenced by a hard tissue module consisting of neurocranium and rostrum (RS) shape, as well as the jaw musculature. RS itself does not strongly covary with other aspects of the skull and brain however, suggesting decoupling of beak morphology from the rest of the avian cranium. All variables, with the exception of RS, are strongly influenced by size, supporting the idea that allometry is a major influence on craniofacial integration in birds. These results provide new insights into likely drivers shaping the evolution of the skull in birds and highlight the usefulness of phyloSEM testing hypotheses of evolutionary modularity and integration.
More Related Videos
09:38Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras
Published on: May 31, 2014
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Overview of the Skull
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Limits to Natural Selection
Convergent Evolution