Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

The lateral view of the cranium is dominated by temporal, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones.
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...

Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View

Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View

The superior view of the cranium shows the frontal and paired parietal bones.
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...

Overview of the Skull

Overview of the Skull

The cranium (skull) is the skeletal structure of the head that supports the face and protects the brain. It is subdivided into the facial bones and the brain case, or cranial vault. The facial bones underlie the facial structures, form the nasal cavity, enclose the eyeballs, and support the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...

Sutures of the Skull

Sutures of the Skull

The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.For one, natural selection can only act upon existing genetic variation. Hypothetically, redtusks may enhance elephant survival by deterring ivory-seeking poachers. However, if there are no gene variants—or alleles—for redtusks, natural selection cannot increase the prevalence of...

Convergent Evolution

Convergent Evolution

Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.The structures that arise from convergent evolution are called analogous structures. They are similar in function even if they are dissimilar in structure. Further, structures can be analogous while also...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparative cranial biomechanics reveal macroevolutionary trends in theropod dinosaurs, with emphasis on Tyrannosauroidea.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026

Same author

Avian cranial evolution is influenced by shape interactions between hard and soft tissue traits.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same author

The wide gape of snakes: A comparison of the developing mandibular symphysis in sauropsids.

Journal of anatomy·2025

Same author

Biological and Physical Environmental Drivers of Diet Variation in Northern Fur Seals.

Ecology and evolution·2025

Same author

Measuring complexity for hierarchical models using effective degrees of freedom.

Ecology·2024

Same author

FISHGLOB_data: an integrated dataset of fish biodiversity sampled with scientific bottom-trawl surveys.

Scientific data·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

Structural Equation Modelling Reveals How Allometry Shapes Integration in Avian Cranial Evolution.

J W Oyston¹, J T Thorson², A Knapp¹

¹Centre for Integrative Anatomy, Division of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, UK.

Integrative and Comparative Biology

|July 2, 2026

Summary

This study used structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyze bird skull and brain evolution. Findings reveal distinct modules for brain, neurocranium, and jaw, with beak shape largely independent of other traits.

More Related Videos

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Published on: May 31, 2014

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Published on: May 31, 2014

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Comparative anatomy
Quantitative genetics

Background:

Phenotypic modularity is key to understanding trait evolution, but its study in high-dimensional systems is challenging.
Birds exhibit diverse skull and brain morphologies, with debated levels of integration versus modularity.
Phylogenetic structural equation modeling (phyloSEM) offers new methods for analyzing trait covariation in an evolutionary context.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate phenotypic modularity and integration in avian skull and brain evolution using phyloSEM.
To test hypotheses regarding functional or developmental modules within the bird skull.
To identify correlates of modularity, such as allometric scaling.

Main Methods:

Application of phylogenetic structural equation modeling (phyloSEM) to high-dimensional trait data from bird skulls and brains.
Statistical analysis of covariation patterns among skull and brain traits within a phylogenetic framework.
Model comparison to evaluate different hypotheses of modular organization and integration.

Main Results:

The best-supported model identified distinct modules for brain shape, neurocranium, and a jaw module (rostrum and jaw musculature).
Rostrum shape showed limited covariation with other skull and brain traits, suggesting decoupling.
All traits, except rostrum shape, were significantly influenced by size (allometry), indicating its importance in craniofacial integration.

Conclusions:

Avian skull evolution is shaped by both modular organization and pervasive allometric scaling.
The findings support a partially modular structure of the bird skull, with a degree of independence in beak morphology.
PhyloSEM is a powerful tool for testing evolutionary hypotheses of modularity and integration in complex phenotypic datasets.