Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Gastric Point of Care Ultrasound in Adults: Image Acquisition and Interpretation
Published on: September 22, 2023
Rapid Gastric Emptying: Insights from a Large Cohort Study on a Controversial Disorder
Mario El Hayek1, Aman Bali2, Varun Moktan2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. elhayek.mario@mayo.edu.
Introduction:
Rapid gastric emptying (RGE) is conventionally defined as ≥ 70% emptying of a standardized solid meal at 1 h using gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES). However, this threshold is not universally adopted, and variability exists in how accelerated gastric emptying is defined in practice. We aimed to better characterize patients with conventionally defined RGE as well as those with accelerated emptying not meeting this threshold, and to evaluate what clinical differences exist across varying degrees of accelerated gastric emptying.
Methods:
We identified a cohort of 258 adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with increased gastric emptying (≥ 30% emptied at 1 h) at a tertiary medical center. Patients with a history of esophageal, gastric or thoracic surgery were excluded. Patients were stratified into three cohorts based on 1-h gastric emptying percentages: 30-49%, 50-69%, and ≥ 70%. Manual chart review was performed to extract data on demographics, medications, laboratory values, GES indications, and management changes resulting from GES findings.
Results:
The majority of patients (n = 205, 79.4%) were in the 30-49% emptying cohort. Only 10 patients (3.9%) met the conventional threshold of ≥ 70% emptying at 1 h. The most common indications for GES were nausea (39.1%), vomiting (33.7%), and abdominal pain (25.6%), with no statistically significant differences in indications across the 3 cohorts. Furthermore, there were no differences in age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, medications, or management changes between the cohorts.
Conclusions:
RGE that meets current consensus criteria is uncommon in clinical practice. Clinical characteristics and interventions were similar among cohorts with different degrees of accelerated emptying. The current cutoff of ≥ 70% emptying at 1 h may not represent a clinically distinct phenotype, emphasizing the need for better criteria to guide diagnosis and management.
Related Concept Videos
Gastric Emptying
Pyloric Obstruction
Bulimia Nervosa
Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders
Binge Eating Disorders
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
