Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

04:08
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Longitudinal Incision for Endoscopic Submucosal Excavation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions
Published on: April 28, 2026
Clinical Outcomes of Non-Operative Versus Operative Treatment in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic
1Department of General Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
ANZ Journal of Surgery
|July 3, 2026
Summary
Operative management reduces adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) recurrence but increases complications and costs. Elective surgery may benefit patients with recurring ASBO episodes.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Outcomes
- Systematic Reviews
Background:
- Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common complication after abdominal surgery, often leading to recurrent episodes despite conservative treatment.
- Adhesions, the primary cause of ASBO, persist even after successful non-operative management, highlighting the need to evaluate different treatment strategies.
- This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the clinical outcomes of operative versus non-operative management for ASBO.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of operative and non-operative management strategies for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO).
- To evaluate differences in recurrence rates, mortality, complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS) between surgical and non-surgical approaches.
- To determine the optimal management strategy for ASBO, particularly for recurrent cases.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for relevant randomized and non-randomized studies (NRSs) published up to November 2025.
- Pooled results for recurrence, mortality, complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were analyzed.
- The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included NRSs.
Main Results:
- Operative management significantly reduced ASBO recurrence across all study designs.
- No significant differences in overall mortality were observed, except for short-term mortality in clinical data NRSs.
- Operative treatment was linked to higher complication rates, longer LOS, and increased treatment costs compared to non-operative management.
Conclusions:
- While operative management effectively reduces ASBO recurrence, it is associated with increased complications, longer hospital stays, and higher costs.
- Non-operative management may be preferred for initial episodes due to lower morbidity and costs.
- Elective surgery presents a potential benefit for patients experiencing recurrent episodes of adhesive small bowel obstruction.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...