Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

The design space of E(3)-equivariant atom-centred interatomic potentials.

Nature machine intelligence·2025
Same author

Role of ITGB2 protein structure and molecular mechanism in precancerous lesions of gastric cancer: Influencing the occurrence and development of cancer through the CXCL1-CXCR2 axis.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2025
Same author

Analysis of Local Structure of Mechanical and Thermal Rearrangements in Glasses with the Atomic Cluster Expansion.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2024
Same author

Hyperactive learning for data-driven interatomic potentials.

npj computational materials·2024
Same author

ACEpotentials.jl: A Julia implementation of the atomic cluster expansion.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023
Same journal

Vision language models for scientific image analysis: an evaluation highlighting opportunities and challenges.

npj computational materials·2026
Same journal

Cavity control of multiferroic order in single-layer NiI<sub>2</sub>.

npj computational materials·2026
Same journal

Extraction of the self energy and Eliashberg function from angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy using the xARPES code.

npj computational materials·2026
Same journal

Equivariant electronic Hamiltonian prediction with many-body message passing.

npj computational materials·2026
Same journal

Enhancing the efficiency of time-dependent density functional theory calculations of dynamic response properties.

npj computational materials·2026
Same journal

System-conditioned reparameterization of the SCAN functional for accurate bandgaps: from analytical constraints to machine learning.

npj computational materials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Flexible uncertainty calibration for machine-learned interatomic potentials.

Cheuk Hin Ho1, Christoph Ortner1, YangShuai Wang2

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.

Npj Computational Materials
|July 3, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new uncertainty calibration framework for machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs). It enhances prediction accuracy and reliability in atomistic simulations by learning environment-dependent uncertainties.

Keywords:
Materials scienceMathematics and computingPhysics

More Related Videos

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Computational Materials Science
  • Machine Learning in Physics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is crucial for trustworthy machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) in atomistic simulations.
  • Conformal prediction (CP) offers formal coverage guarantees for UQ but often struggles with accuracy, scalability, and adaptability to complex atomic environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a flexible and efficient uncertainty calibration framework for MLIPs.
  • To improve the accuracy and adaptability of predictive intervals in MLIPs.
  • To enable more robust and reliable atomistic simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Reformulated conformal prediction (CP) as a parameterized optimization problem for direct learning of environment-dependent quantile functions.
  • Developed a flexible uncertainty calibration framework compatible with diverse MLIP architectures and baseline UQ schemes.
  • Validated the framework using the MACE-MP-0 foundation model across various benchmarks.

Main Results:

  • Achieved sharper and more adaptive predictive intervals with negligible computational overhead.
  • Demonstrated substantial improvements in uncertainty-error correlation and detection of high-error configurations for active learning.
  • Showcased reliable transferability across different exchange-correlation functionals and system types (ionic crystals, catalytic surfaces, molecular systems).

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework offers a practical and data-efficient approach to robust and transferable uncertainty quantification in MLIPs.
  • This method enhances the reliability of atomistic simulations by providing accurate and adaptive uncertainty estimates.
  • The framework's generality and compatibility pave the way for broader adoption in materials science and related fields.