Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Fast Imaging Technique to Study Drop Impact Dynamics of Non-Newtonian Fluids
Published on: March 5, 2014
Droplet Fusion as a Relaxation Process: Comparison with Shape Recovery of Newtonian and Viscoelastic Droplets
Mohammad Moein Naderi1, Zhangli Peng1,2, Huan-Xiang Zhou2,3,4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Abstract:
Biomolecular condensates formed by phase separation inside cells often exhibit viscoelastic behavior, yet their shape recovery and fusion dynamics are frequently interpreted using purely viscous models. Here, we develop a unified theoretical and computational framework to quantify how viscoelasticity governs these two fundamental processes. We combine analytical theory for small-deformation shape recovery with axisymmetric finite-element simulations based on the Oldroyd-B constitutive model to systematically investigate both shape recovery and droplet fusion under comparable physical conditions. Our results show that, although both processes are driven by capillary forces, they are fundamentally distinct in their underlying physics. Shape recovery is governed by global viscocapillary relaxation of a single connected interface and follows single- or multi-exponential decay depending on the relative magnitude of the viscocapillary timescale and the stress relaxation time. In contrast, droplet fusion is intrinsically a multistage process involving localized curvature-driven neck formation, rapid bridge expansion, and a transition to global relaxation. We demonstrate that viscoelasticity introduces an additional intrinsic timescale that governs the competition between capillary driving and stress relaxation, characterized by the Deborah number. This leads to enhanced intermediate-stage fusion dynamics and modified relaxation behavior compared to Newtonian droplets. Furthermore, we show that the presence of an exterior fluid with finite viscosity introduces additional hydrodynamic dissipation through two-phase coupling, significantly slowing the fusion process. Finally, we compared the computationally predicted droplet fusion in the Newtonian and viscoelastic cases with a stretched-exponential empirical formula. Deviations observed in viscoelastic regimes highlight the limitations of purely viscous descriptions and the need for models incorporating stress relaxation and memory effects.
More Related Videos
10:28Experimental Measurement of Settling Velocity of Spherical Particles in Unconfined and Confined Surfactant-based Shear Thinning Viscoelastic Fluids
Published on: January 3, 2014
08:02Fabricating High-viscosity Droplets using Microfluidic Capillary Device with Phase-inversion Co-flow Structure
Published on: April 17, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving
A velocity gradient forms within the fluid when a Newtonian fluid is placed between two parallel plates, with...
Phase Transitions: Vaporization and Condensation
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model
Viscosity of Fluid
Viscosity
The SI unit of viscosity is...
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...