Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
Reliability of airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) in predicting extubation failure in critically ill patients
Jihad Mallat1,2,3, Nicolas Storme4, Mohamed Askalany1
1Critical Care Division, Integrated Hospital Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Background:
The airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) reflects the central respiratory drive and correlates with patients' inspiratory effort. This study aimed to assess whether changes in P0.1 (ΔP0.1) during the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), as well as SBT-induced changes in the products of P0.1 and the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) (Δ(P0.1 × RSBI)) and P0.1 and respiratory rate ((Δ(P0.1 × RR)), can predict extubation failure (EF) in critically ill patients.
Methods:
In this bicentric prospective study, we enrolled 114 intensive care unit (ICU) patients who had been mechanically ventilated for more than 48 h and successfully tolerated a 30-min SBT on pressure support ventilation. Respiratory variables, including P0.1 and RSBI, as well as hemodynamic parameters, were recorded within 5 min of SBT initiation and at its completion. EF was defined as the need for reintubation and resumption of mechanical ventilation within 7 days. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated for both relative and absolute ΔP0.1, Δ(P0.1×RSBI), and Δ(P0.1×RR).
Results:
Among the 114 patients, 23 (20.2%) experienced EF. At baseline, P0.1, P0.1×RR, and P0.1×RSBI values did not differ significantly between the success and failure groups. During the SBT, P0.1, P0.1×RR, and P0.1 × RSBI increased significantly in the failure group, while remaining unchanged in the success group. Absolute ΔP0.1 demonstrated poor predictive performance for EF, with AUC of 0.69 (P=0.005). In contrast, absolute Δ(P0.1×RSBI), and absolute Δ(P0.1 × RR) showed moderate predictive ability, with AUCs of 0.79 (P<0.001) and 0.76 (P<0.001), respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, the absolute, but not the relative, ΔP0.1, Δ(P0.1×RR), and Δ(P0.1×RSBI) remained independently associated with EF after adjustment for potential confounders.
Conclusions:
Variations in P0.1 and in the combined parameters P0.1×RSBI and P0.1×RR during the SBT provided limited value for predicting EF in critically ill patients.
Trial Registreration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05802745.
Related Concept Videos
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Endotracheal Intubation II: Nursing Management
1. Nursing Care of Patients Before Intubation
Before the endotracheal intubation procedure, nurses play an essential role in ensuring the process goes smoothly. The nurses must be familiar with intubation...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Pneumothorax II: Pathophysiology
Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
