Related Experiment Videos
Clinical Outcomes of Complete Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients With High Bleeding Risk and
Onyou Kim1,2, Hyun Sung Joh3, Hyun Kuk Kim4
1Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea.
Journal of the American Heart Association
|July 3, 2026
Summary
Complete revascularization (CR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease significantly lowers adverse events, even in those with high bleeding risk (HBR). CR offers improved outcomes without increasing bleeding complications for HBR patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- High bleeding risk (HBR) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients correlates with worse prognosis.
- Limited data exists on the impact of complete revascularization (CR) in AMI patients with multivessel disease and HBR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic impact of CR in AMI patients with multivessel disease, specifically comparing outcomes between those with and without HBR.
- To assess the association of CR with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and bleeding events in these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 13,460 patients with AMI and multivessel disease from a Korean registry (2011-2020).
- Patients underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention for the infarct-related artery.
- Primary outcome was MACCE over 3-year follow-up; HBR classification used modified Academic Research Consortium-HBR criteria.
Main Results:
- 32.7% of patients had HBR; 35.8% underwent CR.
- HBR patients had significantly higher MACCE (35.7% vs. 16.4%) and bleeding risk (10.4% vs. 4.5%) compared to non-HBR.
- CR was associated with lower MACCE in both HBR (28.1% vs. 40.0%) and non-HBR (13.1% vs. 19.0%) groups, with similar bleeding event rates between CR and incomplete revascularization.
Conclusions:
- CR improves outcomes by reducing MACCE in AMI patients with multivessel disease, irrespective of bleeding risk.
- CR is a safe and effective strategy for both HBR and non-HBR patients, demonstrating comparable bleeding event rates.