Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Context-specific allocation of attentional control in anxiety and uncontrollability.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

A longitudinal study of socioeconomic status and cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults in China: random intercept cross-lagged panel analysis.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Shaping attitudes toward body-related cues via evaluative conditioning: investigating the roles of social comparison and self-esteem.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

The fastest among us… The unique capacity of self-control of upper alpha brain oscillations for expedited mental rotation by some individuals.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Higher- and lower-level processing in strategic reading: Reconceptualising the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS).

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

More caution or more lenient: deciphering the role of negative affect in recognition and inference.

Cognitive processing·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

The STEARC effect revisited: does time shape spatial attention and memory?

Simay Alptekin1,2,3, Simge Şişman Bal4

  • 1Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. simay.alptekin@medipol.edu.tr.

Cognitive Processing
|July 3, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The study confirmed number-space (SNARC) and time-space (STEARC) effects but found no influence of temporal cues on visual attention or memory. This suggests temporal-spatial links are less robust in tasks without direct left-right responses.

Keywords:
Attentional orientingSNARC effectSTEARC effectTimeVisual-spatial attentionVisual-spatial memory

More Related Videos

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • The spatial representation of numbers (SNARC effect) and time (STEARC effect) suggests a deep link between abstract concepts and spatial dimensions.
  • Investigating whether these spatial mappings extend to influence visual-spatial attention and memory is crucial for understanding cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the influence of temporal information on visual-spatial attention and memory.
  • To determine if time-based spatial associations affect attention shifts and memory retrieval.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized four tasks: SNARC task (number magnitude judgment), STEARC task (temporal word judgment), visual-spatial attention task, and visual-spatial memory task.
  • Employed a single-key response procedure in attention and memory tasks to isolate effects from response biases.

Main Results:

  • Confirmed the existence of both the SNARC effect (number-space association) and the STEARC effect (time-space association).
  • No significant effect of temporal reference cues on visual-spatial attention or visual-spatial memory was detected under the experimental conditions.

Conclusions:

  • While number-space and time-space mappings are confirmed, their influence on visual attention and memory may be limited.
  • Temporal-spatial associations might not be readily apparent in tasks lacking explicit left-right response requirements.