Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024
The accuracy of artificial intelligence in identifying cephalometric landmarks: A scoping review
Yen Ming Lin1, Asa Auta2, Jeremy Brown2
1Department of Orthodontics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5PS, United Kingdom.
Background:
Accurate identification of cephalometric landmarks is essential for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Manual landmarking is time-consuming, requires clinical expertise, and is susceptible to intra- and inter-examiner variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to automate this process, improving efficiency and consistency.
Aims:
To map the current evidence on the use of AI for cephalometric landmark detection, identify trends in the AI methodologies employed, and highlight gaps in the literature requiring further research.
Methods:
This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline were searched up to April 2024, and identified 68 eligible studies. Data extracted included datasets used, numbers of landmarks assessed and expert examiners involved, AI algorithms employed, and reported performance outcomes.
Results:
The included studies analysed approximately 450,000 lateral cephalograms, frequently using the IEEE ISBI Grand Challenge 2015 dataset. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most common AI architecture. Several AI systems achieved landmark localisation comparable to expert clinicians, with mean errors within 2mm, although performance varied between studies and landmarks. Heterogeneity in study design, datasets, validation methods, and reporting standards limited comparison of the findings.
Conclusions:
AI may have a role in supporting cephalometric landmark detection. However, considerable variation in reported performance outcomes was observed across studies, potentially reflecting differences in landmark identification protocols, algorithm design, and dataset characteristics. The evidence remains heterogeneous, and further research using standardised methodologies and diverse datasets is needed to evaluate the applicability of these systems in routine clinical practice. DOI registration link on OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CGVSU (accessed on June 29, 2026).
More Related Videos
10:23Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025