Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Assessing genotype by feed interactions for milk production traits in dairy cattle
E L P Guennoc1, M G J Edens2, M S Gilbert2
1Animal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
None:
Dairy farming systems are evolving toward more sustainable production practices, and these changes may enhance genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E). Analyses of G × E would benefit from detailed information on feeding practices, however, such data are rarely incorporated, largely because they are not routinely available. This study investigated G × E for milk production traits using detailed information on feeding practices using reaction norm models, and assessed differences between organic and conventional farming systems using character state models. Environmental descriptors were available for 973 Dutch dairy farms over the period 2016-2021. These descriptors included the proportion of dietary concentrate (% of diet DM), nitrogen use efficiency (NUE, %), phosphorus use efficiency (PUE, %), and dietary net energy for lactation (NEL, MJ/kg DM). For comparison, we also included the more commonly used descriptor herd average milk yield per cow (HMY, kg/cow/year). The data set included 101,979 first lactation milk production records, of which 6,094 originated from organic farms and 95,885 from conventional farms. Heritability (±SE) of milk yield was 0.36 ± 0.04 in organic and 0.44 ± 0.01 in conventional farming systems. Heritability of milk yield increased from 0.17 ± 0.02 when feeding 13.0% to 0.54 ± 0.01 when feeding 43.0% dietary concentrate (DM basis). Similarly, heritability of milk, fat, and protein yield increased with increasing NUE, PUE, NEL and HMY. In our study, the residual variance was assumed constant across environmental descriptors; therefore, the increase in heritability was due to an increase in genetic variance. Heritability of milk fat and protein content and somatic cell score showed limited response to changes in environmental descriptors. Genetic correlations between the same trait across environmental descriptors were generally near unity, except for yield traits across HMY levels. These results indicate G × E arising from scaling effects, but provide little evidence of genotype re-ranking across environments. Ignoring scaling effects leads to biased EBVs for environments deviating from the average. Multivariate analyses that include traits beyond milk production are needed to quantify the potential implications for selective breeding programs.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Incomplete Dominance
Punnett Squares
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...
Epistasis Analysis
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

