Related Experiment Videos
Effect of Key Baseline Disease Characteristics on Aflibercept 8 mg Dosing Interval Extension: A Post Hoc 96-Week
Justus G Garweg1, Varun Chaudhary2, Xin Zhang3
1Swiss Eye Institute and Clinic for Vitreoretinal Diseases, Berner Augenklinik, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital (Bern University Hospital), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Objective:
Post hoc analysis of the PULSAR phase 3 trial (NCT04423718) to determine whether dosing interval outcomes were associated with key baseline disease characteristics.
Design:
Exploratory post hoc analysis of PULSAR, a 96-week, double-masked, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial in patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with aflibercept 8 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. For the main analysis, patients receiving aflibercept 8 mg were grouped according to their last assigned dosing interval at weeks 48 and 96.
Participants:
Patients with treatment-naïve nAMD who were randomly assigned to receive aflibercept 8 mg in PULSAR.
Intervention:
Aflibercept 8 mg was administered every 12 weeks (8q12) or 16 weeks (8q16), each after 3 initial monthly injections. Dosing intervals could be shortened in year 1 based on prespecified disease activity criteria, whereas in year 2, both interval shortening and extension were allowed. Patients were monitored every 4 weeks but assessed for interval modification at dosing visits only.
Main Outcome Measures:
Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and macular neovascularization (MNV) area were assessed in patients grouped by their last assigned dosing interval (Q8, Q12, Q16, Q20, or Q24) at weeks 48 and 96.
Results:
In 86.6% and 78.4% of patients assigned to the 8q12 and 8q16 arms in PULSAR, respectively, randomized dosing intervals were maintained or extended through week 96. In the 8q12 arm, no trends were observed in baseline BCVA, CRT, and MNV area across groups based on patients' last assigned dosing intervals. In the 8q16 arm, no trends were observed in baseline BCVA across treatment arms; however, patients with shorter last assigned dosing intervals (Q8 and Q12) at weeks 48 and 96 tended to have a greater baseline CRT or MNV area compared with patients with longer dosing intervals (Q16-Q24).
Conclusions:
Overall, findings from this PULSAR post hoc analysis of key baseline characteristics in patients grouped by dosing interval suggest that the aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 regimens were suitable for most patients across a broad range of baseline BCVA, CRT, and MNV area values, with a large proportion of patients able to achieve and maintain extended dosing intervals through week 96.
Financial Disclosure(S):
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Time Course of Drug Effect