Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Rat Mammary Epithelial Cell Transplantation into the Interscapular White Fat Pad
Published on: March 4, 2020
Tissue identity is the dominant determinant of cross-species transferability of a porcine developmental programme
Tianyuan Liu1,2,3, Rujing Lei1, Ilyas M Khan4
1Cardiff School of Engineering, Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK.
Background:
Reproducibility and cross-species translation using the domestic pig (Sus scrofa) are limited by the lack of a standardised molecular framework for biological maturation: the pig's developmental tempo differs substantially from the human's, yet no tissue-resolved transcriptomic staging system exists. Synchronising porcine and human maturation is essential to move preclinical research from descriptive to predictive.
Results:
We built a transcriptomic atlas of porcine development across five tissues (muscle, brain, liver, blood, lung) from 1,924 PigGTEx RNA-seq profiles. A single partial-least-squares (PLS) regressor staged each tissue at its native ordinal resolution and also drove cross-species transfer and biomarker extraction. Our central result: transfer of a pig-trained developmental score to other species is dominated by tissue identity, with phylogenetic distance a weaker secondary effect. Projected onto the seven-species Cardoso-Moreira atlas, transfer was strongest for brain and heart ([Formula: see text]-0.92) and weakest for the labile liver and ovary ([Formula: see text] and 0.42). Brain and heart stayed high even from pig to chicken ([Formula: see text] across ∼320 Myr), whereas liver and ovary collapsed. A variance partition confirmed the ranking (organ Type-II [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]; phylogeny significant only at the species level, Spearman [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The score independently confirmed lung, muscle, and adipose on the human dGTEx resource ([Formula: see text]-0.67) against an ortholog-scramble null and three controls. Because it is fit on pig and projected onto foreign-batch atlases, the transfer cannot arise from a pig-side artefact. A web application is available at https://pigdevstage.streamlit.app.
Conclusions:
The porcine developmental programme transfers to humans and more distant amniotes in a tissue-dependent manner, so the pig's value as a developmental model is set by how conserved each organ's developmental logic is, not by phylogenetic proximity. Validated on foreign-species atlases, the transfer sidesteps the stage-study confound that bounds within-pig staging to muscle and liver. The atlas is therefore best used organ by organ: strong for conserved organs (brain, heart) and weak for labile ones (liver).
Related Concept Videos
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms
Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms
