Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Danish validation of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT)
Peter N Schøler1,2,3, Kjeld Andersen1,3,4, Maja Thiele5
1Unit for Clinical Alcohol Research, Research Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Aim:
To assess the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off scores of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) and AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) in a Danish general population.
Methods:
Questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Data collection from 26 September to 29 October 2024, via an anonymous online test of alcohol habits among adults aged 25+ years.
Measures:
Demographics, AUDIT, self-reported International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision (ICD-10) criteria for alcohol dependence, yes/no item on harmful alcohol use. We defined hazardous use as >10 standard drinks/week (national recommendations) and possible dependence as ⩾3 ICD-10 criteria. We evaluated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), diagnostic properties and optimal cut-offs.
Results:
Total sample: 17,959 participants, mean age 66.32 (SD=12.72) years, 51% males. Nineteen per cent reported drinking hazardously, 7.5% answered yes to harmful use and 7.8% to dependence according to ICD-10. AUDIT showed good diagnostic discrimination for hazardous use (AUC=0.89) and dependence (AUC=0.96), but not for harmful use (AUC=0.61). Internationally recommended AUDIT cut-offs for hazardous use and dependence were supported, with lower thresholds in women and the older (65+ years). AUDIT-C: hazardous use (AUC=0.92), dependence (AUC=0.92), harmful use (AUC=0.58). Optimal AUDIT-C cut-offs: hazardous 6, dependence 6, with age- and sex-specific variations. Internal consistency was high for AUDIT (α = 0.83) and low for AUDIT-C (α = 0.61).
Conclusions:
Both instruments performed well for detecting hazardous use and possible dependence but not for harmful use. AUDIT-C might serve as an initial screening tool for hazardous drinking, followed by the full AUDIT for detailed assessment. Local circumstances should be considered when defining appropriate cut-offs for AUDIT and AUDIT-C.
Related Concept Videos
Protection of Alcohols
Protection
It defines a protecting group as the masking agent to make the more reactive species inert to a given set of conditions. This concept is depicted via the illustration of liquid flow through different outlets in an assembly of pipes. The analogy helps to understand the role...
Physical Properties of Alcohols and Phenols
Alcohols possess a higher boiling point than aliphatic hydrocarbons of similar...
Alcohols from Carbonyl Compounds: Reduction
Catalytic hydrogenation is similar to the reduction of an alkene or alkyne by adding H2 across the pi bond in the presence of transition metal catalysts like Raney Ni, Pd–C, Pt, or Ru. Aldehydes and ketones can be reduced by this method, often under mild to moderate heat (25–100°C) and...
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Conversion of Alcohols to Alkyl Halides
CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine

