Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
Surface Properties of Synthesized Nanoporous Carbon and Silica Matrices
Published on: March 27, 2019
Thermodynamic characterization of selected biomaterial surfaces: Comparison of surface free energy approaches
Frank Rupp1, Jacob Schultheiss1, Bertram Herzog2
1Department of Medical Materials Science and Technology (MWT), Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
Abstract:
The thermodynamic surface properties of biomaterials play a key role in governing interfacial interactions and are commonly characterized by surface free energy (SFE) and its components derived from wetting data. However, different theoretical approaches used for SFE determination may yield substantially different results, particularly for polar and high-energy surfaces. In this study, the total surface free energy and its components were systematically analyzed for a range of clinically relevant biomaterial surfaces, including titanium, gold, cobalt-chromium alloy, nano-hydroxyapatite, and amorphous Teflon, prepared as smooth thin films on glass substrates. Static contact angles with water, glycerol, ethylene glycol, and diiodomethane were measured to assess wettability and to calculate SFE using three commonly applied models: the Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaelble (geometric mean) approach, the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-base (LW-AB) approach, and the equation of state (EOS) approach. These models estimate total SFE as well as nonpolar, polar, and acid-base components, enabling a detailed comparison of model-dependent surface energetic data. The results show good agreement between the different approaches for low-energy, hydrophobic surfaces, whereas pronounced discrepancies occur for hydrophilic, high-energy materials, particularly in the calculated polar and acid-base contributions. While total SFE values were partly consistent across methods, the relative magnitudes of individual SFE components strongly depended on the applied theoretical model. Overall, this study highlights that SFE should not be considered an intrinsic material property but a model-dependent descriptor. Careful selection of the SFE calculation approach and cautious interpretation of SFE components are essential when using thermodynamic surface analysis to compare biomaterial surfaces or to relate surface energetics to interfacial phenomena such as biofilm formation.
Related Concept Videos
01:16Surface Tension and Surface Energy
Consider a beaker filled with liquid. The bulk molecules in the liquid experience equal attractive forces on all sides with the surrounding molecules. However, the surface molecules experience a net attractive force downward due to the bulk molecules. The surface of the liquid behaves like a stretched membrane,...
02:23Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability
01:24Surface Tension
02:39Gibbs Free Energy
02:57Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...
01:05An Introduction to Free Energy