Related Experiment Videos
Exploring the Effectiveness of Practice Development Interventions on Patient and Staff Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Hazel A Smith1, Vanda Carter2, Charlotte Phillips2
1Centre for Health Innovation/Centre for NMAHP Research and Education Excellence (CeNREE), University of Staffordshire/University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Aim:
To explore Practice Development interventions and associated contextual factors to understand their impact on patient and staff outcomes and experiences in healthcare settings.
Design:
Systematic review.
Methods:
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis informed design, conduct and management. A systematic approach was taken, utilising multiple reviewers and consensus methods. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool informed quality appraisal. Qualitative findings were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Quantitative results are presented as a narrative summary.
Data Sources:
CINAHL; MEDLINE; PubMed; Scopus; ScienceDirect; Nursing and Allied Health; Cochrane Library; Internurse.com; The Kings Fund; GOV.UK and Trip Database were searched between 1st January 1980 to 5th January 2026.
Results:
Twenty-nine studies were included. Eighteen studies met all quality assessment criteria. Limited quantitative data was available, and inconsistent outcome measures constrained quantitative analysis. Qualitative analysis generated three themes: (1) Shaping Practice: the interplay of organisational context, culture, and structure, (2) Enablers and constraints in Practice Development, (3) Collective empowerment.
Conclusion:
Across diverse study designs, the majority of studies indicate that PD contributes positively to staff working environments and the contexts in which patient care is delivered. However, current findings do not demonstrate consistent improvements in clinical outcomes or quality of life.
Implications For Practice:
Practice Development may contribute to improvements in care environments for patients and staff, respectively. This review highlights knowledge gaps in the generalisability and transferability of Practice Development that would benefit from further exploration.
Impact:
Practice Development may enhance healthcare environments, but further research is needed to determine if these benefits impact upon clinical outcomes.
Reporting Method:
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses.
No Patient Or Public Involvement:
No patient or public contribution.
Trial Registration:
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024557949.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Patient-centered Care
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation