Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
Prediction versus explanation of preadolescents' psychopathology: environmental data predict while brain measures
Daniela G Juarez1,2, Katherine E Jennings1, Arielle S Keller1,3
1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Background:
Brain characteristics, environmental risks, and their interactions are believed to contribute to the development of psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether these factors differ in their utility for predictive versus explanatory goals; few predictive studies have combined and compared neuroimaging and environmental features, and Brain × Environment studies of explanatory processes have not adopted comprehensive, data-driven methods. Here, we integrated neuroimaging and environmental data to predict youths' psychopathology and to explore brain-based measures of sensitivity to environmental influence.
Methods:
Leveraging the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (release 5.1), we conducted analyses with up to 9,370 participants with complete baseline environmental, neuroimaging, and psychopathology data. Symptoms were assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist. Environmental exposures measured from parent-report, youth-report, and geocoded data were used to create a general exposome factor and six specific subfactors. Anatomical, resting-state functional connectivity, and diffusion MRI data were included as brain-based predictors. Nested cross-validated models assessed the predictive utility of environmental data, neuroimaging data, and their interactions. Elastic net models identified Brain × Environment interactions in nonpredictive analyses.
Results:
Environmental data far outperformed neuroimaging in predicting psychopathology in unseen data. Although Brain × Environment interactions did not improve prediction accuracy, they revealed neural moderators of environmental effects in nonpredictive models. Measures involving the hippocampus, amygdala, salience network, and attentional networks were overrepresented among neural moderators. Certain brain features conferred increased or decreased sensitivity to supportive and adverse environments.
Conclusions:
Our findings not only highlight the value of environmental data for predicting preadolescents' psychopathology but also show that neuroimaging data play a role in supporting explanatory models of neural sensitivity to context.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Published on: March 12, 2020
07:30Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
Published on: August 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia