Related Experiment Video For actionable mutations
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel for Immuno-oncology Studies on Formalin-fixed Carcinoma Tissue Specimens
Published on: January 21, 2019
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Versus Genomic Profiling in Cancer: Roles in Precision Medicine
Yassir M Elshami1, Abuobaida Abukhelaif2, Omer A Elrheima3
1Histopathology, Laboratory and Blood Bank, King Khaled Hospital, Najran, SAU.
Abstract:
Precision oncology increasingly depends on accurate biomarker assessment to guide targeted therapies. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has long been central to routine pathology due to its accessibility and diagnostic utility; however, the expanding role of molecularly driven treatments has highlighted limitations in protein-based testing. Genomic profiling, using next-generation sequencing (NGS), enables direct detection of genetic alterations that may not be reflected at the protein level. This review explored how IHC and molecular diagnostic approaches contribute to tumour diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic management across solid tumours. The review process framework followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Literature retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science yielded 15 published studies comparing IHC and genomic profiling methods in precision oncology. Genomic profiling consistently identified clinically actionable alterations that were missed or misclassified by IHC, including gene fusions, exon-skipping events, copy-number alterations, and pathogenic mutations lacking reliable protein-level surrogates. High discordance was observed for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), mesenchymal-epithelial transition gene exon 14 skipping alteration (MET exon 14), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), mismatch repair status, and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Across multiple tumour types, genomic testing refined molecular classification and expanded eligibility for targeted and immunotherapies beyond IHC-based assessment. The evidence reviewed indicates that genomic technologies expand tumour characterisation beyond conventional protein-based biomarkers by detecting mutations, copy-number changes, gene fusions, and other actionable molecular events. While IHC remains valuable for initial screening, integration of genomic testing is essential for accurate biomarker assessment and optimal treatment selection in modern precision oncology.
More Related Videos
06:32Multiplex Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Spatial Immune Cell Landscape of the Tumor Microenvironment
Published on: August 18, 2023
08:18Multiplexed Barcoding Image Analysis for Immunoprofiling and Spatial Mapping Characterization in the Single-Cell Analysis of Paraffin Tissue Samples
Published on: April 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
These...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets