Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
How Does the Anterior Maxillary Arch Change After Unilateral Lip Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tran Duc Ky Truong1, Tien Thi Trieu Truong2, Phuong Hoai Lam3,4
1Maxillofacial Surgery Department, National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology in Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam.
Abstract:
ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify morphological changes in the anterior maxillary arch-specifically anterior cleft width (CW) and anterior curvature angle (ACA)-following primary lip repair in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, DOAJ, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through January 2025. Eligible studies reported quantitative pre- and post-operative data on anterior arch morphology. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model with the Knapp-Hartung adjustment. Meta-regression assessed the influence of baseline cleft width and follow-up duration.ResultsTen studies comprising 11 patient cohorts and 265 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled mean difference in anterior CW) was -6.217 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): -7.230 to -5.204; P < .001), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 81.8%). Meta-regression identified initial cleft width as a significant predictor (β = -0.842; P = .002), and follow-up duration showed a borderline association (β = -0.387; P = .051). The predictive equation was: CW(change) = 4.465 - 0.842 × initial width - 0.387 × duration. Lip repair also reduced the anterior curvature angle (MD = -14.66°; 95% CI: -19.62 to -9.7), though heterogeneity was very high (I² = 88.1%).ConclusionPrimary lip repair significantly improves anterior arch dimensions in children with UCLP. Initial cleft width predicts postoperative changes, and the proposed model may support early treatment planning. However, due to substantial heterogeneity across studies, small sample sizes in some included cohorts, and very low certainty of evidence for both outcomes (GRADE approach), the findings should be interpreted with caution and considered exploratory.
