Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Patient Identification of the most important outcomes in a gastrointestinal behavioral health program
Robert E Brady1, Brooke A Duarte1, Corey A Siegel1
1Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, USA.
Background:
Brain-gut behavior therapies (BGBTs) are evidence-based treatments for patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While BGBT clinical trials prioritize decreasing symptom severity and improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life, these outcomes are not designed based on patients' priorities. We aimed to determine the optimal patient-centered outcome measures to assess change following BGBT using a stakeholder-engaged qualitative process.
Methods:
We interviewed patients 1:1 with DGBI and IBD with and without BGBT experience. Interview data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Subsequent focus groups reviewed the qualitative findings to verify accuracy, identify high-priority and missing constructs, and create clinical use recommendations. Measure recommendations were developed based on patients' perspectives and the extant literature.
Results:
Qualitative interviews (N = 20) yielded five domains: lived experience of disease, how to cope with illness, perceived value of behavioral intervention, outcomes and measurement, and behavioral intervention effects. Focus group participants (N = 14) broadly confirmed that the qualitative themes represented their experience with BGBTs and prioritized confidence in symptom management, social connectedness, lived experience with disease, and mental/behavioral health symptoms. They highlighted the importance of brevity, semi-regular re-evaluation, and access to results. Resultant measures included: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions-Symptoms, UCLA Loneliness Scale, IBD DISK (adapted), and PHQ-2/GAD-2.
Conclusions:
The identified treatment targets differed from those prioritized in clinical trials. However, DGBI and IBD literature suggests that many of the identified constructs supersede traditional outcomes such as anxiety and depression. These results can guide integration of patient-reported outcome measures into gastropsychology programs and highlight the value of involving patients in program development.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Binge Eating Disorders
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Irritable Bowel Syndrome III: Medical and Nursing Management