Related Experiment Videos
METEOR: a data-adaptive Mendelian randomization method for powerful detection of shared and specific exposures
Liye Zhang1,2, Ran Yan1,2, Weiming Gong1,2
1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China.
Abstract:
Accurate identification of causal exposures for multimorbidity can benefit the co-prevention and co-management of multiple-related outcomes. This goal can be conceptually addressed within a multi-outcome Mendelian randomization (MR) framework. However, existing multi-outcome MR methods suffer from restrictions on format and availability of data inputs, fail to account for the potential sample overlap, rely on pre-selected independent instrumental variables (IVs), and are unable to account for horizontal pleiotropy. Here, we propose METEOR, a novel MR method that jointly models one exposure and multiple outcomes to identify both shared and outcome-specific causal exposures. METEOR accounts for sample overlap between exposure and outcomes, allows outcomes from different genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets, self-adaptively determines IVs from correlated single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and explicitly models horizontal pleiotropy. Using summary statistics, METEOR infers causal effects under a joint-likelihood framework with a scalable, sampling-based algorithm. Simulations show that METEOR presents well-calibrated $P$-values for both global and single-outcome tests, and achieves average power improvements of 55.33% and 56.50% over five existing MR methods in the global and single tests, respectively. In real data applications, METEOR produces the most accurate causal effect estimates in positive control analyses, reduces false positives by 18.75% in negative control analyses, and highlights that controlling BMI could benefit the co-management of multiple cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and multiple gastrointestinal (GI) diseases, while controlling blood pressure could benefit the co-management of multimorbidity across CVDs and mental disorders (MDs), as well as across GI diseases and MDs.
Insights
Identifying causal exposures for multiple diseases is crucial for prevention. METEOR, a new multi-outcome Mendelian randomization method, accurately identifies shared and specific causal exposures, improving upon existing approaches.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Epidemiology
- Statistical Genetics
- Causal Inference
Background:
- Accurate identification of causal exposures for multimorbidity is essential for effective co-prevention and co-management strategies.
- Existing multi-outcome Mendelian randomization (MR) methods have limitations, including data input restrictions, inability to handle sample overlap, reliance on pre-selected instrumental variables (IVs), and failure to account for horizontal pleiotropy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose METEOR, a novel MR method for jointly modeling one exposure and multiple outcomes to identify shared and outcome-specific causal exposures.
- To address limitations of existing multi-outcome MR methods by accounting for sample overlap, utilizing diverse GWAS datasets, adaptively selecting IVs, and modeling horizontal pleiotropy.
Main Methods:
- METEOR employs a joint-likelihood framework with a scalable, sampling-based algorithm to infer causal effects using summary statistics.
- The method integrates multi-outcome analysis, sample overlap correction, adaptive instrumental variable selection from correlated single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and explicit horizontal pleiotropy modeling.
Main Results:
- Simulations demonstrate that METEOR provides well-calibrated P-values and achieves significant power improvements (55.33% global, 56.50% single-outcome tests) over existing MR methods.
- Real-data applications show METEOR yields accurate causal effect estimates, reduces false positives by 18.75%, and identifies potential causal exposures for co-managing diseases.
Conclusions:
- METEOR is a powerful and flexible tool for multi-outcome MR analysis, capable of identifying shared and specific causal exposures.
- The findings suggest that interventions targeting BMI could benefit co-management of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases, while blood pressure control may aid multimorbidity across cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and mental disorders.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Regression Toward the Mean