Applying an intersectional framework to characterize chronic pain disparities one year following traumatic spinal
Joel Fundaun1, Titilola Falasinnu2, Dario Pfyffer1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
The Journal of Pain
|July 6, 2026
Summary
Chronic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) disproportionately impacts socially disadvantaged groups. Intersectional disparities in pain severity and interference highlight the need for targeted interventions to address these inequities.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Chronic pain affects nearly 70% of individuals post-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), often leading to disability.
- Existing research on SCI recovery disparities is more robust than that on chronic pain, with limited studies examining the intersectional impact of social determinants.
- Prior studies often used smaller cohorts and analyzed social determinants in isolation, failing to capture their combined effects on chronic pain outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the intersectional disparities in chronic pain severity and interference among adults with traumatic SCI.
- To identify modifiable mediators contributing to these disparities in pain outcomes.
- To inform the development of targeted interventions for equitable pain management post-SCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing the US Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems database (n=3,514 adults with traumatic SCI).
- Exposures included race/ethnicity, annual income, and education level, analyzed for intersectional effects.
- Outcomes measured were pain severity (numeric rating scale) and pain interference (SF-12), with adjusted statistical models and causal mediation analyses.
Main Results:
- Non-Hispanic Black, lower-income, and lower-education participants reported significantly higher pain severity and more frequent severe pain interference (p<0.0001).
- Intersectional analysis revealed that Non-Hispanic Black, low-income, low-education participants experienced substantially higher pain severity and odds of severe pain interference compared to their counterparts (q<0.0001).
- Mobility, community participation (days out-of-house), insurance status, and perceived health significantly mediated pain disparities (ACME 0.158-0.312 for severity, 0.017-0.043 for interference; all q<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Chronic pain following traumatic SCI disproportionately affects individuals from socially disadvantaged backgrounds.
- Intersectional analysis reveals significant disparities in pain severity and interference, underscoring the cumulative impact of multiple disadvantages.
- Modifiable mediators, including functional status and access to resources, present potential targets for interventions aimed at reducing inequities in chronic pain management after SCI.

