Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Dynamic Light Scattering Analysis for the Determination of the Particle Size of Iron-Carbohydrate Complexes
Published on: July 7, 2023
Comparing Ferric Carboxymaltose Versus Iron Sucrose in Patients with Heart Failure
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Insights
Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) effectively repleted iron stores in heart failure (HF) patients with iron deficiency (IDef) more often than iron sucrose. This study highlights FCM as a superior option for iron repletion in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Limited comparative data exists for intravenous (IV) iron products in heart failure (HF) patients with iron deficiency (IDef).
- Optimal IV iron selection is crucial for managing IDef in HF.
- Understanding product efficacy aids clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) versus iron sucrose for iron repletion in HF patients.
- To evaluate IDef therapy goal achievement rates between FCM and iron sucrose.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study at a single center.
- Included patients with HF (reduced/mildly reduced ejection fraction) and IDef receiving FCM or iron sucrose.
- Primary outcome: IDef therapy goal achievement (defined by ferritin, iron saturation, or hemoglobin levels).
Main Results:
- Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) use was associated with significantly higher IDef treatment goal achievement (70.1%) compared to iron sucrose (41.2%) (p=0.026).
- Adjusted analysis confirmed FCM's superior efficacy (adjusted OR 5.8; p=0.022).
- No significant difference in adherence to IV iron criteria was observed between groups.
Conclusions:
- Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) demonstrated a higher iron repletion rate than iron sucrose in HF patients with IDef.
- FCM may be a more effective IV iron option for this patient group.
Background:
Limited evidence comparing different intravenous (IV) iron products is available to guide the optimal IV iron product in patients with heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (IDef).
Objectives:
To compare ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) with iron sucrose in patients with HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction and IDef who received either FCM or iron sucrose. The primary outcome was IDef therapy goal achievement (defined as ferritin 100-300 mcg/L and iron saturation > 20%; ferritin > 300 mcg/L; or hemoglobin > 15 mg/dL regardless of iron study).
Results:
A total of 78 patients in the FCM group and 21 in the iron sucrose group were included. The use of FCM was significantly associated with a higher rate of IDef treatment goal achievement after the induction course than iron sucrose (70.1 vs. 41.2%, p = 0.026). After adjusting for multiple variables, FCM use was significantly associated with a higher rate of the primary outcome than iron sucrose (adjusted OR 5.8 [95% CI 1.3-26.1], p = 0.022). No significant difference in adherence to the IV iron criteria was found between the two groups (80.8 vs. 81.0%, p = 0.985).
Conclusion:
Ferric carboxymaltose use was associated with a higher iron repletion rate than iron sucrose in patients with HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction and IDef.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
