Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
Emergency department evaluation of immature granulocytes for complicated acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort
Burak Katipoğlu1, Hamdi Haluk Çalı1, İsmail Borazan1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Insights
Immature granulocyte (IG) count and percentage (IG%) are not reliable preoperative biomarkers for distinguishing complicated acute appendicitis (CAA) from non-complicated acute appendicitis (NAA) in adults. These markers did not show clinically meaningful diagnostic value for CAA or perforation in this study.
Area of Science:
- Medical diagnostics
- Clinical pathology
- Surgical outcomes
Background:
- Preoperative identification of complicated acute appendicitis (CAA) is crucial for minimizing patient morbidity.
- Assessing the diagnostic utility of immature granulocyte (IG) count and IG percentage (IG%) for predicting CAA and perforation in adults is important.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of IG count and IG% in predicting complicated acute appendicitis (CAA) and perforation.
- To compare the discriminatory power of IG markers against other inflammatory markers like the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 891 adult patients with histopathologically confirmed appendicitis.
- Classification of appendicitis cases into complicated (CAA) and non-complicated (NAA).
- Diagnostic performance assessed using ROC analysis, Youden index, and multivariable logistic regression.
Main Results:
- The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating CAA (0.547), while IG% had an AUC of 0.519.
- Patients with perforation had lower lymphocyte counts and higher NLR values.
- IG% was numerically higher in complicated cases but did not reach statistical significance for predicting perforation in multivariable analysis.
Conclusions:
- IG count and IG% lack clinically significant discriminatory power between CAA and NAA.
- The observed non-significant association of IG% with perforation is hypothesis-generating, not confirmatory.
- Findings do not support the use of IG count or IG% as standalone preoperative biomarkers for adult acute appendicitis, challenging previous studies.
Background:
Preoperative identification of complicated acute appendicitis (CAA) is important for reducing morbidity. We assessed the diagnostic value of immature granulocyte (IG) count and percentage (IG%) for predicting CAA and histopathologically confirmed perforation in adults presenting to the emergency department.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults (≥18 years) with histopathologically confirmed appendicitis admitted to a tertiary care center between January 1, 2025 and January 1, 2026. Cases were classified as CAA or non-complicated acute appendicitis (NAA). Perforation was analyzed as a separate secondary endpoint. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the Youden index, and multivariable logistic regression.
Results:
A total of 891 patients were included (58.6% male; median age, 35 years [IQR 25-47]); 466 (52.3%) had CAA and 105 (11.8%) had perforation. For discrimination of CAA, the highest area under the curve (AUC) was observed for the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (0.547; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.508-0.586), whereas the AUC for IG% was 0.519 (95% CI: 0.479-0.556). Among patients with perforation, lymphocyte counts were lower (p=0.032) and NLR values were higher (p=0.018). Although IG% was numerically higher and demonstrated a small-to-moderate effect size (Cohen's d=0.257), the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.116). In multivariable analysis, IG% did not reach independent statistical significance for perforation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.66; 95% CI: 0.99-2.76; p=0.053), although the point estimate suggested a possible positive association.
Conclusion:
IG count and IG% did not provide clinically meaningful discrimination between CAA and NAA. The non-significant association observed for IG% in the multivariable perforation model should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. These findings challenge the high diagnostic performance reported in previous smaller studies and do not support the use of IG count or IG% as standalone preoperative biomarkers in adult acute appendicitis.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
