Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Protocolized Pain Assessment and Management in Pediatric Trauma Patients
Oluwaseun Adeyemi1, Shareef Syed1, Vrindda Atrii1
1Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Insights
A new pain assessment and treatment (PAT) protocol increased pain assessment in pediatric trauma patients. However, pain evaluation needs improvement for young children and trauma activation cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Care
- Pain Management
Background:
- Inadequate pain assessment is a significant issue in pediatric trauma care.
- A standardized Pain Assessment and Treatment (PAT) protocol was introduced to improve pain evaluation consistency.
- This study investigated the adoption rate and adherence factors of the PAT protocol.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a Pain Assessment and Treatment (PAT) protocol on pain assessment frequency in pediatric trauma patients.
- To identify factors influencing the adoption and adherence to the PAT protocol.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed data from 908 pediatric trauma patients (ages 0-14) treated between 2021 and 2025.
- Pain assessment was the primary outcome, with sociodemographic, injury, and system-level factors as predictors.
- Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with PAT protocol adoption and adherence.
Main Results:
- Pain assessment occurred in 79% of pediatric trauma patients following PAT protocol implementation.
- Protocol adherence increased from 62% in 2021 to 85% in 2023, then plateaued.
- Pre-teens (vs. infants/toddlers) were more likely to have pain assessed (aOR: 1.73), while trauma activations were less likely (aOR: 0.38).
Conclusions:
- The PAT protocol significantly increased pain assessment rates in pediatric trauma patients.
- Further improvements are needed to ensure consistent pain assessment for the youngest pediatric trauma patients (0-3 years).
- Optimizing pain assessment for pediatric trauma patients presenting as trauma activations requires targeted strategies.
Introduction:
Pain in pediatric trauma patients is often under-assessed. A pain assessment and treatment (PAT) protocol was implemented to promote more consistent evaluation. This study examines its adoption and factors associated with adherence. We hypothesized that pain would be assessed more frequently following protocol adoption.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study of 908 pediatric trauma patients (ages 0-14) treated from 2021 to 2025 was conducted at a level II pediatric trauma center. The primary outcome was pain assessment. The predictors included sociodemographic, injury-related, and system-level factors. We reported the trend in protocol adoption and the pattern of adherence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to assess factors associated with the adoption of the PAT protocol; the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.
Results:
Of the 908 pediatric trauma patients, 79% (n = 720) had their pain assessed. Adherence to the PAT protocol increased from 62% in 2021 to 85% in 2023 and plateaued in 2024 and 2025 (79%). The median time from emergency department presentation to pain assessment was 14 min (IQR: 5.0, 31.5). Compared to infants and toddlers, pre-teens were 68% more likely to have their pain assessed in the emergency department (aOR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.08 - 2.78). Patients who presented to the trauma resuscitation area as pediatric trauma activations were 62% (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.25 - 0.59) less likely to have their pain assessed than non-activation patients.
Conclusions:
The adoption of the PAT protocol was associated with increased pain assessment among pediatric trauma patients. However, opportunities remain to improve pain assessment for the youngest patients (0-3 y) and those who arrive as trauma activations.
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
