Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

04:59
A Modified Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Vasoepididymostomy
Published on: June 8, 2022
UK Validation of the First Vascular Surgery Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM): the PREMIERE Study
Maram Darwish1, Robert I Palmer2, James Coulson3
1Southeast Wales Vascular Network, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK; Health Education England, East Midlands Deanery, Nottingham, UK.
Summary
A new Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for vascular surgery was validated. This concise, reliable tool effectively measures patient experiences and supports patient-centered care in vascular services.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs)
- Psychometric Validation
Background:
- Patient experience is crucial in healthcare quality assessment.
- Existing measures may not adequately capture the nuances of vascular surgery patient journeys.
- Development of a specialized instrument is needed for accurate evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To psychometrically validate a novel Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) specifically designed for vascular surgery.
- To establish the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the vascular surgery PREM.
- To provide a tool for patient-centered evaluation of vascular services.
Main Methods:
- The PREM was developed using a multiphase approach including systematic review, qualitative studies, patient interviews, and focus groups.
- Psychometric validation followed COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance.
- Evaluation included item reduction, factor structure analysis, internal consistency (Cronbach's α), construct validity, feasibility, and acceptability across three UK vascular units.
Main Results:
- A 22-item instrument was refined to a 14-item PREM, demonstrating high feasibility (>95% item completion, 7-min average completion time).
- Exploratory factor analysis supported a five-domain structure (information, shared decision-making, access, support, discharge) explaining 58.6% of variance.
- Acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.70–0.78) and significant correlations between PREM scores and clinical factors (hospital stay, admission type) were observed.
Conclusions:
- The vascular surgery-specific PREM is a concise, reliable, and valid instrument.
- It is feasible for routine clinical use and sensitive to meaningful variations in patient experience.
- The validated PREM supports patient-centered evaluation and quality improvement in vascular services.

