Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

A Millimeter Scale Flexural Testing System for Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Marine Sponge Spicules
Published on: October 11, 2017
Physics-guided monotone stacking for reliable prediction of pile load-settlement curves using SPT-[Formula: see text]
Rupesh Kumar Tipu1, Meshel Q Alkahtani2, Sagar Paruthi3
1Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering & Technology, K.R. Mangalam University, Gurugram, India.
Abstract:
Axial load-settlement (P-S) curves govern pile serviceability checks and support performance-based foundation decisions, yet full static load tests to high load levels remain expensive and are often unavailable. This paper presents PILE-STACK, a physics-guided, monotone stacked ensemble that predicts the complete P-S response of single piles from routine site investigation inputs, including SPT-[Formula: see text] depth profiles and pile geometry. The method combines mechanics-aware feature design with diverse level-0 experts and a monotone-constrained meta-learner, then applies a pile-wise isotonic projection that guarantees non-decreasing settlement with increasing load. The framework also quantifies uncertainty using quantile models that are calibrated with split-conformal prediction to obtain distribution-free prediction intervals. Evaluation follows a leakage-safe protocol using GroupKFold by PileID and a disjoint 20% PileID-wise holdout. On the external test set, PILE-STACK achieves [Formula: see text], RMSE [Formula: see text] mm, and MAE [Formula: see text] mm. Service-range accuracy remains stable (SMAPE[Formula: see text], WAPE[Formula: see text]), while curve-level agreement is strong (mean normalized AUC error [Formula: see text]; mean DTW [Formula: see text] mm). The monotonicity audit reports zero predicted violations. Conformalized intervals deliver near-nominal pile-wise coverage, stay tight at working loads, and widen logically as nonlinearity increases. Ablation results show that including a lightweight mechanistic base and expert diversity reduces RMSE by ∼12% and MAE by ∼17% relative to a no-physics variant. The proposed approach produces accurate, mechanically admissible, and uncertainty-aware settlement curves from widely available SPT-[Formula: see text] data, enabling direct serviceability screening when load tests are limited.
Related Concept Videos
Method of Superposition
When applying the method of superposition, each type of load—whether...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Load along a Single Axis
Consider a beam of length L subjected to a varying load, which is a combination of parabolic and trapezoidal load distribution along the x-axis. In this case, it is essential to determine the resultant loads, their locations, and...
Residual Stresses in Bending
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes.
Euler's Formula for Pin-Ended Columns
To calculate the critical load, envision...
