Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Services: A Systematic Literature Review

Over the past two decades, research has shown that measurement-based care (MBC) improves clinical outcomes in mental health care. However, translating MBC into routine practice remains challenging. In this systematic review, the authors aimed to synthesize evidence gathered from 2000 to 2024 on interventions supporting MBC implementation in adult mental health services in order to identify effective strategies and contextual factors.

Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PsycNet databases, yielding 1,120 records in a first search (2000-2022) and 1,095 in a second (2023-2024). The full texts of articles were assessed, and 16 articles selected for final analysis were critically appraised with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Quantitative descriptive study designs were most common. MBC interventions were linked to symptom reduction, improved medication adherence, and increased use of self-report tools. Patient satisfaction rose when MBC supported shared decision making. Providers viewed MBC positively, although feedback practices varied and concerns about relational impact remained. Psychologists engaged more with MBC than did psychiatrists. System-level strategies and electronic health record integration increased MBC uptake, but broad adoption remained difficult. Key barriers included time constraints, lack of training, hierarchical structures, negative attitudes, and technical limitations.

Effective MBC implementation requires context-sensitive strategies, interprofessional collaboration, and active involvement of patients, service users, and caregivers. Future research may focus on underrepresented settings, diverse professional roles, and hybrid designs. Standardized measures and detailed reporting are essential to advance MBC integration and improve care quality.