Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Political polarization of trust in science
Byron Hyde1,2
1Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, UK.
None:
Contrary to widespread claims of a crisis in public trust in science, this article argues that recent pandemic-era trends reflect a long-term pattern of bilateral political polarization rather than a universal decline in scientific confidence. Recent empirical data show that trust and distrust in science have both increased - producing an apparent "pandemic paradox" - driven by ideological bias operating within gaps in public understanding. The study identifies a misunderstanding of how science works as the fundamental cause of politicized trust, where misconceptions create space for ideological bias to shape which claims individuals find credible. Critically, the article argues that existing interventions - improved science communication and increased science education - are insufficient. The core problem is not the quantity of science education but its type. Only by teaching the methodological and institutional limitations of science can the field depolarize public trust and build politically stable confidence in scientific institutions.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Social Proof
Impact of Groups on Groups
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Stereotype Content Model
