Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

14:24
An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025
Strain- and age-dependent divergence in mouse appetitive spatial learning and decision strategies
Jiaoru Liu1,2, Denise Manahan-Vaughan1,2, Josué Haubrich2
1International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|July 8, 2026
Summary
Mouse strain and age significantly impact spatial memory and decision-making strategies in reward-guided navigation tasks. CBA/CaOlaHsd mice showed faster learning and better performance under uncertainty than C57BL/6 mice, with age effects varying by strain.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Animals use spatial memory for goal-directed navigation, relying on hippocampal circuits.
- Aging and genetic background influence hippocampal function and spatial memory processing.
- Understanding strain and age interactions is crucial for deciphering spatial memory mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how mouse strain (CBA/CaOlaHsd vs. C57BL/6) and age (juvenile vs. mature adult) interact to affect spatial appetitive memory.
- To analyze decision-making strategies using reinforcement learning models in a T-maze task.
- To identify strain- and age-dependent differences in learning, performance, and behavioral policies.
Main Methods:
- Daily training of juvenile and mature CBA/CaOlaHsd and C57BL/6 mice in a T-maze task with probabilistic rewards.
- Measurement of correct choices and latencies across training phases.
- Application of reinforcement learning modeling to trial-by-trial data for strategy assessment.
Main Results:
- CBA/CaOlaHsd mice exhibited lower latencies, faster learning, and superior performance during reward probability decreases compared to C57BL/6 mice.
- Aging increased latencies and modulated performance and decision policies in a strain-dependent manner.
- CBA/CaOlaHsd mice showed higher learning rates and better context exploitation; C57BL/6 mice displayed more omission-driven strategy switching.
Conclusions:
- Spatial learning and decision policies in appetitive memory tasks are significantly influenced by both mouse strain and age.
- Distinct behavioral strategies are employed by different mouse strains under uncertainty and aging.
- These findings highlight the complex interplay of genetic and age-related factors in hippocampal-dependent spatial memory.

