Related Experiment Videos
Persistent excess mortality in post-pandemic Japan: current evidence, methodological limitations, and future
Hiroshi Kusunoki1, Ryota Sakai2, Yumi Watanabe3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan.
Frontiers in Public Health
|July 8, 2026
Summary
Japan faces persistently high excess mortality post-COVID-19, with nearly 100,000 annual deaths. This review explores contributing factors and highlights data limitations for future research on mortality trends.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Demography
Background:
- Japan experiences sustained excess mortality years after COVID-19 emergence.
- Mortality increased significantly from 2022, despite high vaccination rates and Omicron variant predominance.
- Potential factors include aging, healthcare access changes, delayed treatment, and psychosocial stress.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine persistent excess mortality in Japan.
- To illustrate methodological limitations using COVID-19 booster vaccination data.
- To advocate for improved data infrastructure for future analyses.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of existing literature.
- Analysis of excess mortality trends in Japan.
- Examination of ecological and observational studies on booster vaccination.
Main Results:
- Excess mortality remains elevated in Japan, approaching 100,000 deaths annually.
- Some studies suggest associations between booster vaccination and excess mortality, but causality is not established.
- Methodological limitations hinder definitive conclusions regarding specific interventions.
Conclusions:
- Persistent excess mortality in Japan requires further investigation beyond direct COVID-19 impact.
- Robust, linked individual-level data and advanced analytical frameworks are crucial for accurate future evaluations.
- Causality between repeated booster vaccinations and excess mortality cannot be concluded from current evidence.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Causality in Epidemiology
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Actuarial Approach
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...