Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
Published on: January 10, 2014
Identification of key sentences in a text
N Veer Viswajit1, L Jeganathan1, M Janaki Meena1
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Abstract:
Human evaluation of students' summative assessments requires significant time and cognitive effort. Existing automated evaluation models struggle to provide accurate evaluations for various reasons. The complexity increases with lengthy student responses, which may contain both relevant and irrelevant information. Therefore, there is a need for an intermediate mechanism to assist human evaluation. To address this gap, this study presents, as a proof of concept, a semantic-aware model called the Key Sentence Identifier (KSI), which extracts sentences that are relevant to the topic and coherent with the meaning conveyed in the student's response. Unlike traditional approaches that rely primarily on keyword matching, KSI employs a dual-embedding framework that integrates transformer-based contextual embeddings (BERT) with semantic similarity-based sentence representations (SBERT). Furthermore, a dedicated dataset has been curated for this task to enable effective training and evaluation of the model. Ablation analysis indicates that the SFT BERT + SFT SBERT configuration achieves the best performance, improving the F1 score from 50.32% (BERT + SBERT) to 86.01%. Furthermore, comparisons with LoRA-based fine-tuning and standard baseline methods show that the proposed KSI model consistently outperforms alternative approaches in identifying contextually relevant sentences. The novelty of the proposed KSI lies in its ability to efficiently evaluate descriptive answers by identifying contextually relevant content for human evaluation. In addition to reducing evaluation time, KSI minimizes the cognitive effort required by human evaluators by eliminating the need to manually identify irrelevant content. Thus, the use of KSI has the potential to enhance the quality of evaluation by enabling evaluators to focus on contextually relevant content while reducing cognitive effort. As improvements in evaluation quality can positively influence learning outcomes, KSI can, more broadly, contribute to the realization of United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4. A distinguishing feature of the KSI model is that it assists human evaluation and supports integration with future automated evaluation systems.
Related Concept Videos
Structural Protein Function
Collagen, the most abundant protein in mammals, is found throughout the body. In connective tissue, such as skin, ligaments, and tendons, it provides tensile strength and elasticity. In bones and teeth, it mineralizes to form...
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the test...
Transfer RNA Synthesis
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...
Significance Testing: Overview
Protein Complex Assembly
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
