Quantifying Physical Activity Through Step Count Estimation Across Multiple Wearable Sensor Configurations: A...

ObjectiveThe study aimed to identify the most accurate protocol for measuring stride-count in post-stroke and healthy individuals, by comparing different wearable-sensors, their placement and data processing against a gold-standard instrumented treadmill.MethodsEighteen post-stroke and 18 healthy adults walked at multiple speeds on an instrumented treadmill equipped with force plates. Participants wore six ActiGraph accelerometers (wrists, hips, ankles), and pressure insoles. Stride counts from each sensor configuration were estimated using a custom raw-acceleration peak-detection algorithm and the manufacturer's algorithm (ActiLife^®). Accuracy and agreement with the gold standard were assessed across walking speeds and sensor locations using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and linear mixed-effects model.ResultsStride count accuracy was influenced by walking speed across all wearable configurations, improving with gait velocity. Pressure-sensing insoles demonstrated the highest accuracy and agreement with the gold standard in both groups across speeds (CCC = 0.999 for healthy subjects; 0.996 for post-stroke). The custom peak-detection algorithm applied to ankle-worn accelerometers provided accurate and robust stride estimates across speeds (CCC = 0.986 in healthy subjects; 0.990 post-stroke). In contrast, the manufacturer's algorithm consistently misestimated stride counts in both groups. No side-to-side differences were observed for any sensor placement.ConclusionPressure insoles and our custom raw-acceleration algorithm applied to ankle-worn accelerometers yielded the highest stride-count accuracy across walking speeds in both populations.Trial registry name and URLClinicalTrails.gov (Registration ID: NCT06943014).