Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

A Neonatal Imaging Model of Gram-Negative Bacterial Sepsis
Published on: August 12, 2020
Machine Learning to Identify Bacteremia and Meningitis in Febrile Infants: A Systematic Review
Giacomo Ferraris1, Sara Tazzoli1, Camilla Folisi1
1Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua University Hospital, Italy.
Context:
The accurate identification of febrile infants who are at risk for invasive bacterial infections (IBIs), ie, bacteremia and meningitis, is essential to reduce morbidity and avoid unnecessary procedures. The role of machine learning (ML) in improving their diagnostic accuracy remains under evaluation.
Objective:
To systematically review the diagnostic performance of ML-based models for identifying febrile infants aged up to 90 days with IBIs.
Data Sources:
Comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform databases through December 2024.
Study Selection:
Eligible studies applied ML models to febrile infants aged up to 90 days to identify IBIs and reported diagnostic metrics and used culture-confirmed infections as the reference standard. Of 4756 screened records, 6 met inclusion criteria.
Data Extraction:
Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, model types, outcomes, and accuracy measures. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Marked methodological heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.
Results:
Six studies evaluated various ML models, including logistic regression, random forests, neural networks, support vector machines, and ensemble. Sensitivity ranged from 57% to 100%, specificity ranged from 30% to 94%, and ROC-AUC ranged from 0.57 to 0.9. Several models outperformed traditional tools (eg, PECARN, Step-by-Step), particularly in specificity, for IBI prediction.
Limitations:
Limitations included the predominance of retrospective data collection, limited reporting on data handling, and lack of external validation.
Conclusions:
ML models show promising performance for identifying infants at risk for IBIs, improving specificity over traditional tools. Future work should systematically incorporate and transparently report explainability analyses to support clinical interpretability. Broader validation, methodological standardization, and careful clinical integration are essential before adoption.
Insights
Machine learning models show promise in identifying febrile infants at risk for invasive bacterial infections (IBIs), offering improved specificity over traditional methods. Further validation and standardization are needed for clinical integration.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Medical Informatics
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- Accurate identification of febrile infants at risk for invasive bacterial infections (IBIs) is crucial for reducing morbidity and avoiding unnecessary procedures.
- Machine learning (ML) is being evaluated for its potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the diagnostic performance of ML-based models for identifying febrile infants (up to 90 days) with IBIs.
Main Methods:
- Searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, etc.) through December 2024 for eligible studies.
- Included studies used ML models on febrile infants (≤90 days) for IBI identification, reporting diagnostic metrics with culture-confirmed infections as the reference standard.
- Extracted study characteristics and accuracy measures; assessed risk of bias; heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.
Main Results:
- Six studies evaluated various ML models (logistic regression, random forests, neural networks, etc.).
- Sensitivity ranged from 57% to 100%, specificity from 30% to 94%, and ROC-AUC from 0.57 to 0.9.
- Several ML models demonstrated superior specificity compared to traditional tools (e.g., PECARN) for predicting IBIs.
Conclusions:
- ML models show promising performance for IBI risk identification in infants, outperforming traditional tools in specificity.
- Limitations include retrospective data, limited reporting, and lack of external validation.
- Future research requires explainability analysis, broader validation, standardization, and careful clinical integration for adoption.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Bacterial Meningitis
Viral Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Rapid Identification of Pathogens